That is the question that is dodging Cricket Australia for awhile now. Will it be Steve Smith who will open the batting or will it be Travis Head who will open the batting? It is a question that they are trying desperately to answer. The retirement of David Warner, has left a void at the top of the order. It is a surprise that other regular openers like Matt Renshaw or Cameron Bancroft are not even considered. Steve Smith, took it upon himself to open the innings last year but was a complete misfit at the top. Will Australia run the same risk against India? There are 3 major batsmen in Australia in the form of Khwaja, Smith and Head, two of them India’s nemesis. Head has settled quite nicely in the middle-order with some flamboyant innings. Would he want to jeopardise that? Will he or won’t he?

Ian Chappell, the much respected Australian voice, has termed the prospect of Head opening the innings as a desperate ploy. He is of the opinion that the stronger Indian bowling attack will be able to prevail over Head.

“Any move to open with Head that is designed to unsettle Jasprit Bumrah is asking a lot of the batter. Bumrah, and to a lesser extent Mohammad Siraj, are unlikely to be battered into altering their attacking mentality.

As well as fine fast bowlers, Head is also vulnerable against good offspin bowling. The wily R Ashwin is unlikely to be panicked by an opponent’s ultra-aggressive approach. The argument could be mounted that opening with Head means he’d be more settled facing Ashwin with some runs on the board. On the other hand, a smart opposing captain can utilise the offspinner with a newish ball.”

Head and his success and India

I think that Head as the opener against India will be a gamble. Sure, Head has a lot of success against India. The famous hundred in WTC finals which tilted the game in favour of Australia is a case in point. One more hundred in the ODI World Cup Final, he has become a thorn in the flesh for India. He has been extremely successful at number 5. The belligerent hundreds that propelled Australia’s score to incredible proportions, Australia will not want to miss out on that. Ofcourse, there isn’t any proof to the alternative that he will not succeed as an opener. For all we know, he may well continue with his aggressive ways at the top. It could to be the ideal foil for Khawaja.

Will Australia want to take that chance? They now possess Mitchell Marsh is who equally capable of providing the same innings as that of Head. Would that prompt Cummins to try Head at the top? Marsh for all we know has been inconsistent. The fact that he scored runs in Australia last year, is not a guarantee that he will continue to do so. The absence of Cameroon Green must also be taken into account because Marsh will be expected to bowl that many overs. Green may play as a pure batsman and Marsh because of his past injuries, may not bowl that many overs. It greatly diminishes their capabilities as allrounders.

Former Australian captain Tim Paine was asked about Smith as an opener. He replied candidly: “As an opposition player I want him at the top of the order because that gives me the best chance of getting him out.” The same logic applies to Head as an opener in Test cricket.

Smith the other choice

Which leaves with Smith, who has been incredibly prolific against India, to continue to open. However, all his success has come at number 4. At the top, he has proved that he is not that effective. Would Australia want to continue to trust Smith at the top?

It is amazing that Australia who is usually a settled side, is now struggling with an opener to partner Khawaja. This is unheard of. They usually have every spot covered with multiple choices but it is unbelievable that they are not able to find an opener who can open in their own country.

Wrapping up will he or won’t he

I think that neither Head nor Smith will open when India will be in town. It will boil down to one of Renshaw or Brancroft or it could be someone from outside. The chances of opening with Smith or Head and thereby risk the entire game is slim.

Explore More

The Border Gavaskar trophy

The Border Gavaskar trophy

The Border Gavaskar trophy. The series is another 2 months away. India have a series against Bangladesh and New Zealand whereas Australia have a short series in England. Yet, the

Read More

Shane Warne and his childhood

Shane Warne and childhood

Following on with the Shane Warne autobiography, this blog is about Shane Warne and his childhood. In 1989, Warne was dropped from the St. Kilda Football Club. The background is,

Read More

England managed to keep Ashes alive

The whole of England would have screamed The Ashes is alive, The Ashes is alive, The Ashes is alive. Well, it is indeed alive. England fought back really well and ensured that they live to fight another day. The action at Headingley, the scene of Ben Stokes’s previous exploits, was riveting. The tension was palpable on the face of everyone watching the game. There were multiple heroes for both England and Australia. England will be the more happier of the 2 teams who were fighting for The Ashes. The victory was fashioned not by Stokes but by a bloke who is just in his first year in international cricket and a fast bowler, who should have been in the starting eleven right from Edgbaston. How did England managed to keep Ashes alive? The inclusion of Mark Wood He has got pace. He runs in hard and is not shy of releasing the ball at uncomfortable speeds. That, he wasn’t part of the England team from Edgbaston is for me, an unpardonable oversight unless he was injured. Wood’s pace and movement after pitching clearly unsettled every Australian player. I have been advocating for Wood to be included in every game until the series is decided. Ofcourse, it makes sense to protect such a precious asset but why wouldn’t you want to make use of his services when the series is alive? Does anyone think that without Wood, England would still have won and that too after the infamous Bairstow incident at Lords? I doubt it. Wood was clearly the difference between the 2 sides. Cummins who looked quite comfortable and assured of himself with the bat at Edgbaston and Lords, suddenly turned into a nervous wreck. Not just Cummins, the entire Australian tail was weary of facing upto Wood. They were afraid of getting hit by one of his thunderbolts. For once, Ollie Robinson’s words came true. Johnny Bairstow continues to flounder If only Bairstow had held onto the chances, England by now would have been leading 2-1 and not the otherway around. His keeping is not at all international standard. He misses every regulation nick and yet, he is persisted with for his batting. I am not advocating for Bairstow to be dropped but he must be relieved of his wicket-keeping duties. All the 3 games were won the Australia and England by small margins. As such, England cannot afford anymore largesse. It is another matter if England is short of good keepers but in Foakes, they have a worldclass keeper. Ollie Robinson will definitely not play at Old Trafford. It gives a good chance to bring Foakes back to keep wickets. Bairstow will probably be relieved to concentrate on batting alone. It may even unleash the beast within Bairstow. Let us remember that all those match-winning innings that Bairstow played last year, he wasn’t keeping wickets then. His replacement, Harry Brook, has gone on from strength to strength and cannot be dropped. Stokes has a tricky decision to make. Does he risk Ashes by persisting with Bairstow as the keeper or does he solidify the team with the inclusion of a brilliant wicket-keeper? It will shorten the bowling but Broad, Woakes, Wood, Moeen and if needed Stokes and Root will be able to bowl the necessary overs. If Bairstow continues to keep, probably one more Australian might tell him that “you have just dropped the Ashes” Boycott wants him dropped “England took a calculated gamble and it hasn’t worked,” wrote Boycott. “In three Tests he has dropped catches, missed a stumping and can’t score any runs. It is very sad and outwardly he may show he is upbeat and full of exuberance, but when you fail on the big stage in the full glare of publicity there is nowhere to hide and deep down it affects your confidence. Someone needs to be brave for him and take him out of the limelight. Well, I will not go that far. However, I certainly want him replaced as the keeper. Bairstow can continue as a batsman. Harry Brook showed his quality He has the potential to become one of the best batsmen of his era. He displayed remarkable composure under extreme pressure. Brook curbed his natural instinct to bat aggressively and decisively. The situation called for restraint and accumulation. In the company of Woakes, Brook showed what he is made of. England have really found a worthy successor to Root. Australia need not be disheartened The positives for Australia far outweigh the negatives. The excellent comeback of Mitchell Marsh, who may very well have played a match-winning innings if not for lack of support from the other end. Australia will now be very much unsure as to whom to pick. Whether they will have to go back to Green or do they continue with Marsh? Green has been seen as the future of Australian cricket and in the limited exposure, has not done anything wrong to be dropped. He is an excellent fielder at gully. It will make sense to continue with Green. Australia’s real problem is at the top. David Warner. 17 times he has fallen to Broad. Broad is not going anywhere. He will play the final couple of Tests. As such, he will relish the prospect of bowling to Warner. The only saving grace for Warner is that Australia does not have a reserve opener. Head opened in India but he has been so successful at number 5 that it does not really make any sense to move him up the order. Labuschagne himself is not among the runs and he is unlikely to. It leaves Mitchell Marsh to open the innings. I do not know whether he has opened even in Shield cricket but to do that in an international game needs a lot of courage. This could also be Marsh’s only opportunity to force himself into the side. If asked, I probably suspect that he will agree. Wrapping up England managed to keep Ashes alive It is not all doom and gloom for Australia. The momentum hasn’t shifted. This loss was always on the cards given the pressure on England. It took the brilliant bowling of Wood to unsettle them. They will be better off for this exposure

The whole of England would have screamed The Ashes is alive, The Ashes is alive, The Ashes is alive. Well, it is indeed alive. England fought back really well and

Read More