England, the team that redefined how white-ball cricket must be played, is now struggling in the same format. A team that once talked about scoring 500 runs in ODI, is now unable to even win consistently. There has been changes in personnel, drastically at that, but fortunes have not changed. Eversince the retirement of Eoin Morgan, who was the architect of the flamboyance that is usually associated with the England teams post 2015, the captains who succeeded him, were unable to measure upto expectations. What happened to England? It is a question even the ECB is asking themselves. There does not seem to be light at the end of the tunnel.

England will have to reinvent themselves in the short format. The banishment of Johnny Bairstow, Jason Roy and the retirement of Ben Stokes from ODI cricket, is finally having an effect on the team. Bairstow and Roy were the opening combination that more often than not, provided a blistering start. The rest of the batsmen, just carried on from there. Their replacements, Phil Salt or Dan Lawrence is unable to carry forward the torch. They have lost 13 games out of the last 20. It includes three consecutive series defeats. The latest one being against the West Indies.

The ignominy of the 2015 ODI World Cup, propelled them to completely alter the way they approached the format. Eoin Morgan called for brave cricket and the players responded spectacularly. Scores of 350 and 400 suddenly became the norm. The teams batting first, never were sure of a score England could not chase. In trying to score those extra runs, they fell short by a few. The fear of the English batsmen, drove teams to nuts. The situation is completely the opposite now.

Uninspiring leader and an extended lean trot

Jos Buttler, who tookover from Morgan, proved to be an uninspiring leader. He chose to open the innings when usually, he bats in the middle order. Though his batting did not suffer a great deal, he just could not stem the tide. Yes, England did win the 2021 T20 World Cup but that was largely due to a tenacious innings by Stokes. Apart from that one triumph, they were insipid. The early ouster from the 2024 T20 World Cup and more importantly, the disastrous campaign during the 2023 ODI World Cup, foretold something brooding. In the ODI World Cup, they just could not come to terms with the Indian pitch conditions and as a result, a team that was touted as one among the favourites, lost games against low ranked teams and finished at the bottom.

This was further exacerbated by the early exit in the league stage at the T20 World Cup. England just did not know how to change their fortune.

Less experience

The current English ODI players are short of experience. Not a lot of ODI games are being played. It appears that since the first edition of The Hundred, the players who made their debut for England, ODI cricket occupies only 41% of their overall games. Dan Mousley, when he made his debut, told Sam Curran that he really didn’t know what he was doing.

“He almost admitted himself he hadn’t actually played loads of 50-over cricket,” Curran said

Phil Salt, another of the mainstay in England’s ODI setup commented, “I don’t think there’s many players in this team that you could go through and go ‘oh they’re doing a great job right now’,” said Phil Salt ahead of the third ODI, where he made 74. “That’s the reality of it because we’ve not played a lot of 50-over cricket. I’d love something like a domestic 50-over competition. I’d love the opportunity to play in that so you can get the rhythm and it’s not always stop-start.”

Wrapping up what happened to England?

England do have a local ODI tournament but that space is now taken over by The Hundred and the tournament is now towards the end of the season. It is undesirable to lose a series to a team that did not even qualify for the Champions Trophy. Some like Joe Root and Ben Stokes, do not need a lot of internal ODI games to perform at the highest level. They are cricketers who are born to play the game but proper ODI preparation is required for the mortals.

In the crowded schedule that teams from India, Australia and England find themselves in, something will have to give in. For long, there have been talks about scrapping ODI cricket altogether. There is merit in it. The players are only humans and there is a limit to their fitness and energy. If the ICC and the respective boards insist on playing more and more games, the diminishing ability of the players in one format or all the formats, is a given.

Other blogs about England

https://icricketcritique.com/a-thorough-and-marvellous-english-performance/
https://icricketcritique.com/boycott-is-not-happy-with-the-pitches-and-rahuls-whining/
https://icricketcritique.com/andrew-strauss-wants-to-change-the-english-game/
https://icricketcritique.com/what-a-turnaround-for-england/
https://icricketcritique.com/an-incredible-assault-by-the-english-batsmen/
https://icricketcritique.com/comprehensive-win-for-england/
https://icricketcritique.com/is-this-england-team-for-real/
https://icricketcritique.com/england-performance-review-of-2022/
https://icricketcritique.com/why-the-cry-over-bazball/

Explore More

England managed to keep Ashes alive

The whole of England would have screamed The Ashes is alive, The Ashes is alive, The Ashes is alive. Well, it is indeed alive. England fought back really well and ensured that they live to fight another day. The action at Headingley, the scene of Ben Stokes’s previous exploits, was riveting. The tension was palpable on the face of everyone watching the game. There were multiple heroes for both England and Australia. England will be the more happier of the 2 teams who were fighting for The Ashes. The victory was fashioned not by Stokes but by a bloke who is just in his first year in international cricket and a fast bowler, who should have been in the starting eleven right from Edgbaston. How did England managed to keep Ashes alive? The inclusion of Mark Wood He has got pace. He runs in hard and is not shy of releasing the ball at uncomfortable speeds. That, he wasn’t part of the England team from Edgbaston is for me, an unpardonable oversight unless he was injured. Wood’s pace and movement after pitching clearly unsettled every Australian player. I have been advocating for Wood to be included in every game until the series is decided. Ofcourse, it makes sense to protect such a precious asset but why wouldn’t you want to make use of his services when the series is alive? Does anyone think that without Wood, England would still have won and that too after the infamous Bairstow incident at Lords? I doubt it. Wood was clearly the difference between the 2 sides. Cummins who looked quite comfortable and assured of himself with the bat at Edgbaston and Lords, suddenly turned into a nervous wreck. Not just Cummins, the entire Australian tail was weary of facing upto Wood. They were afraid of getting hit by one of his thunderbolts. For once, Ollie Robinson’s words came true. Johnny Bairstow continues to flounder If only Bairstow had held onto the chances, England by now would have been leading 2-1 and not the otherway around. His keeping is not at all international standard. He misses every regulation nick and yet, he is persisted with for his batting. I am not advocating for Bairstow to be dropped but he must be relieved of his wicket-keeping duties. All the 3 games were won the Australia and England by small margins. As such, England cannot afford anymore largesse. It is another matter if England is short of good keepers but in Foakes, they have a worldclass keeper. Ollie Robinson will definitely not play at Old Trafford. It gives a good chance to bring Foakes back to keep wickets. Bairstow will probably be relieved to concentrate on batting alone. It may even unleash the beast within Bairstow. Let us remember that all those match-winning innings that Bairstow played last year, he wasn’t keeping wickets then. His replacement, Harry Brook, has gone on from strength to strength and cannot be dropped. Stokes has a tricky decision to make. Does he risk Ashes by persisting with Bairstow as the keeper or does he solidify the team with the inclusion of a brilliant wicket-keeper? It will shorten the bowling but Broad, Woakes, Wood, Moeen and if needed Stokes and Root will be able to bowl the necessary overs. If Bairstow continues to keep, probably one more Australian might tell him that “you have just dropped the Ashes” Boycott wants him dropped “England took a calculated gamble and it hasn’t worked,” wrote Boycott. “In three Tests he has dropped catches, missed a stumping and can’t score any runs. It is very sad and outwardly he may show he is upbeat and full of exuberance, but when you fail on the big stage in the full glare of publicity there is nowhere to hide and deep down it affects your confidence. Someone needs to be brave for him and take him out of the limelight. Well, I will not go that far. However, I certainly want him replaced as the keeper. Bairstow can continue as a batsman. Harry Brook showed his quality He has the potential to become one of the best batsmen of his era. He displayed remarkable composure under extreme pressure. Brook curbed his natural instinct to bat aggressively and decisively. The situation called for restraint and accumulation. In the company of Woakes, Brook showed what he is made of. England have really found a worthy successor to Root. Australia need not be disheartened The positives for Australia far outweigh the negatives. The excellent comeback of Mitchell Marsh, who may very well have played a match-winning innings if not for lack of support from the other end. Australia will now be very much unsure as to whom to pick. Whether they will have to go back to Green or do they continue with Marsh? Green has been seen as the future of Australian cricket and in the limited exposure, has not done anything wrong to be dropped. He is an excellent fielder at gully. It will make sense to continue with Green. Australia’s real problem is at the top. David Warner. 17 times he has fallen to Broad. Broad is not going anywhere. He will play the final couple of Tests. As such, he will relish the prospect of bowling to Warner. The only saving grace for Warner is that Australia does not have a reserve opener. Head opened in India but he has been so successful at number 5 that it does not really make any sense to move him up the order. Labuschagne himself is not among the runs and he is unlikely to. It leaves Mitchell Marsh to open the innings. I do not know whether he has opened even in Shield cricket but to do that in an international game needs a lot of courage. This could also be Marsh’s only opportunity to force himself into the side. If asked, I probably suspect that he will agree. Wrapping up England managed to keep Ashes alive It is not all doom and gloom for Australia. The momentum hasn’t shifted. This loss was always on the cards given the pressure on England. It took the brilliant bowling of Wood to unsettle them. They will be better off for this exposure

The whole of England would have screamed The Ashes is alive, The Ashes is alive, The Ashes is alive. Well, it is indeed alive. England fought back really well and

Read More

Boycott about Kevin Pietersen

Boycott about Kevin Pietersen

When Kevin Pietersen was sacked, there were many in England who were mystified. Kevin was the top scorer in that series though given the rotten performances of the rest, it

Read More

Draw is back in test cricket

Draw is back in test cricket

The West Indies vs England series and the Australia vs Pakistan series are boring advertisement test cricket. There isn’t any other way to say this. There were lot of expectations

Read More