Well, the series is done and dusted. Literally. India have emerged victorious with a 2-1 result. At the beginning of the series, if someone had informed Rohit that India will win the series with that margin, he would have happily taken it because such was the state of Indian cricket at that point. Rahul, Pujara & Kohli suspect form for way too long, Rohit and Jadeja having not played red-ball cricket for close to a year, Rishabh Pant’s unavailability, naturally India were on the defensive right at the beginning. At the end of the series, India would have loved a bigger margin rather than what they managed ultimately. The takeway for India after the series

It is just incredible to think that India have not lost a series to Australia since 2014. It includes 2 consecutive series wins in Australia. This is an extraordinary achievement. No other team can boast of such a record against Australia throughout the history of the game and certainly not in this millennium. Having said that, has this rivalry become the preeminent in the world? I suppose Australian supporters will not be swayed because for them, the Ashes occupies a much heralded position than any series.

Anyway, speaking about India, what were the real gains and the real loses throughout the series?

Let me begin with the gains

Undoubtedly, Virat Kohli’s mammoth innings in the final test at Ahmedabad. It was a much needed hundred from him after a barren streak of close to 4 years. He is too good a player to have missed out for so long. Ofcourse, there is no doubt that the pitch helped him immensely. It was the flattest pitch in many years in this country. Having said that, runs will still have to be scored and with Kohli’s hundred, an entire nation heaved a sigh of relief. However, it was surprising that he did not press on for a double. Perhaps, he was too tired having run his runs as well as the runs of his partners. Eventually, it was revealed that he had a high fever. Probably he had enough at the end.

Whether Kohli has regained his scoring spree of old remains to be seen. The next Test is the WTC final at The Oval in England where except for one stellar series in 2018, he does not really have fond memories of the country.

Shubman Gill has probably arrived

Shubman Gill has once again shown how good he is with the bat. With hundreds across all the formats, he is surely a player for the present and the future. However, his lack of runs at Indore on a raging turner will once again raise questions about the lack of consistency. On such pitches, he will want to tighten his defense. The one good thing about his batting is that he does not get bogged down. He is always on the lookout for runs. Onething is certain. In Gill, India has found a solid opener who can be at ease in all the formats though I personally will not consider him for T20s.

Though Rohit Sharma tapered off during the series, his first innings hundred paved the way for India to dominate the first and second tests. He had hardly played red-ball cricket prior to the series but showed good composure.

The major disappointment

It is none other than Axar Patel. It might be surprising to read his name but it is a fact that has been overlooked. Axar’s performance with the bat was exceptional. The innings at Delhi not only ensured that India retained the Border Gavaskar Trophy but it also ensured that we will not lose the series. There is not an iota of doubt about his batting but was it his primary skill? No, it is not. He is a bowler who can contribute useful runs lower down the order. It is on this front that he failed to make the series count.

A total of 3 wickets in 4 Tests on spin friendly surfaces just does not wash. Probably, if he had picked up wickets, he may not have been required to contribute substantially with the bat to justify his position. Axar will have to remember that it is only on Indian pitches where he will get opportunities to play. The moment the team leaves India, his chances will evaporate. Jadeja and Ashwin are ahead of him in the pecking order outside of India.

Pujara

He is another major disappointment. Time and again, he goes into the shell and refuses to come out. He is an experienced campaigner and for him to end of short on multiple occasions, it probably is time to look elsewhere.

Other noteworthy contributions

Ashwin and Jadeja were in their elements under favourable and known conditions. They also contributed with the bat quite handsomely. Ashwin reserved his best for the last. On a placid pitch, to pick up 6 wickets for less than 100 runs is extremely good by any standard. The surprise packet was however, Mohammed Shami. He was undoubtedly, the best fast bowler on either side. Shami really put in his all, keeping tight channels with the new ball, and was difficult to get away with when the old ball was reversing. The cartwheeling stumps are a delight for any fast bowler to watch.

Jadeja and no-ball

It must be mentioned that Jadeja’s repeated no-balls may have actually cost India the Indore Test. It is a crime for any bowler to bowl a no-ball because the popping crease is big enough for any bowler to land his feet just inside the line, whereas Jadeja, is always so close to the front line that if almost any ball can be a no-ball. He needs to correct this abomination quickly lest he contribute towards further losses. Just imagine a scenario where he takes the last Australian wicket in the WTC finals with Australia requiring one run to win and that wicket actually turns to a no-ball.

Wrapping up the takeway for India after the series

This was a good result for the team but they will be severely tested in June.

Other related blogs can be read here, here, here, here, here and here

Explore More

The top and middle-order let India down – 3

Ravindra Jadeja Probably the most improved batsman in the world. I will write a separate blog about Jadeja. In this test, he showed why he is preferred to Ashwin though it was never between Jadeja and Ashwin. I have always said that Jadeja plays outside of India as a specialist batsman. Everyone knows that his bowling is non-threatening in English conditions. He may take advantage of a 5th day wearing pitch and that is about it. He paced his innings beautifully. The way he manipulated strike with the tail in the first innings was excellent. If only Pant had stayed with Jadeja, the lead could have been around the 450 mark. Shardul Thakur Shardul Thakur is not an express fast bowler. As such he can never terrorise any batsman with his pace. He is in the team in overseas conditions because he can contribute with the bat. If he fails with the bat and does not keep the economy rate down and provide breakthroughs, it is tough to justify his inclusion. After the enormous partnership between Pant and Jadeja, India needed one more partnership of 50-odd runs to establish authority over England. If only Shardul had stayed with Jadeja at the point, we may have well earned another 60-75 runs. A first innings score of close to 500 would have proved quite challenging but Shardul failed with the bat at the wrong time. Moreover, his bowling was not threatening and he missed an easy sitter of Stokes. Shardul was the star performer earlier in the series and as such this one bad game should not invite condemnation. However, Shardul must realise that he is in the team for his batting as much as he is for his bowling. In hindsight, would Ashwin had been a better choice than Shardul? Maybe may not be. The only reason that I am not able to emphatically say yes is the fact that there is no proof to the contrary. As Manjrekar rightly said, he is yet to take a 5-fer in the countries that matter. With age not on his side, it is anybody’s guess whether he will be able to correct that aberration. Mohammed Shami Shami is a brilliant bowler. We know that. Shami bowls some magic balls. We know that too. Shami makes the batsmen play more often. We know that one as well. Shami is unlucky. That is the problem. He is good and he does bowl lot of excellent deliveries but if they do not fetch frequent wickets, then there is a problem that needs to be identified. A couple of wickets in the second innings just when things started to look dicey for India, would have put the game firmly in India’s grasp. His record in England is a major concern. Just 38 wickets in 13 tests, under 3 per test is not the expected return from the premier fast bowler. It is unfortunate that despite his obvious talent, he has often failed to deliver against the major teams. This is the 3rd consecutive test that India failed to defend and Shami has a lot to contribute towards that dismal record. One good thing about Shami is that he showed maturity while batting in the first innings. He gave adequate support to Jadeja which is good to see. He played the short-balls much better than Shreyas. He will have to work with experts and see where is he going wrong? Does he have to pitch the ball much closer or short? Is the length the problem? Jasprit Bumrah The captain played a blinder and absolutely annihilated Broad. Sadly, it was with the bat. With the ball however, Bumrah once again failed at the crunch. He is quickly becoming the Kohli of bowling. For someone this talented, his match winning feats are less. He is the most protected Indian bowler. He has played all but just 2 of the games outside India. Bumrah is often given a break from tests in India. It makes sense because his action is so irregular that over-bowling may result in an injury but being the bowler the opposition plays cautiously and being the premier Indian bowler, to have failed to defend scores in the last innings on three successive occasions, it really casts a big question mark on his effectiveness. Whether all the pampering, is it really worth? The Edgbaston game was the 5th time in the last 10-12 tests that Bumrah did not raise to the occasion. It includes the WTC finals in conditions that is any fast bowler’s dream. Ofcourse, he picked up 5 wickets in the test but was still unable to break the Root-Bairstow partnership. I have written that he is becoming the Kohli of bowling. Kohli is similar in the sense that when faced with a target to chase, this is about Test cricket only, he is unable to win the game with his bat. He had a couple of opportunities in South Africa in 2017 and a couple more in England in 2017. Bumrah had this one apart from the two tests in South Africa, the WTC finals and the 2nd test in New Zealand. The last one was a long shot because the target was meagre. One thing to note is that he is not the rabbit with the bat anymore. He has certainly improved on that front but it is his bowling that is required. Mohammed Siraj Siraj usually is quite expensive. Even when he is among the wickets, he is expensive but even for him, this test would have been an awakening. He was literally taken apart by both Bairstow and Root. Towards the final stages, the way Bairstow toyed with him in the last over, any bowler would have been ashamed. These are early days and he has shown sufficient skill to become the mainstay but he must also realise that being the 3rd choice bowler, his chances will be limited when India play at home. Conclusion to the top and middle-order let India down This was a golden opportunity for India to win a series in England. Ofcourse, not when they were 98/5 but once a lead of 134 runs was secured, India must have accelerated quickly and must have built an impenetrable position. The negativity of Pujara, Vihari and to an extent Kohli and Jadeja, the recklessness of Pant, the inability of Gill to make a rare opportunity count and the impotence of the bowlers in the final innings meant that India were lucky that they had an upper hand for more than 60% of the game. Remember, we played with one player less because Shreyas is literally a free wicket. By the next time, India go over to England, some of these players would have retired and whether we will get another chance in the foreseeable future, is doubtful.

Before reading the top and middle-order let India down – 3, please read part 1 & 2 Ravindra Jadeja Probably the most improved batsman in the world. I will write

Switch hit and Free hit

Switch hit and Free hit

Ian Chappell, the former Australian captain and an excellent commentator and thinker of the game, has opined that the switch hit will have to be banned from the game. He

The heartbreak and the elation

The heartbreak and the elation

The news of Ashwin’s disc slip on the hip brought the world of the family crashing down. Ashwin’s father, consulted another doctor who said that two surgeries would be required,