Some serious ICC playing rule changes. The game of cricket has witnessed a lot of changes over the last 120 years. It probably is the most complex of all the sports. I do not think that any other sport can even come close to cricket when it comes to the myriad rules. Golf which is another cumbersome game is some distance away. Trying explaining cricket to someone in Europe or America or in Brazil. They just would not understand. You might spend considerable amount of time explaining the rules to them but in the end they will go away with a blank expression on their face. Why go that far? Even the fans of the game will find it really hard to understand certain rules.

Like the recent instance when a LBW decision against Rishabh Pant was overturned by the third umpire but the 4 runs, the ball went over the boundary, was not awarded to the team. Even the die-hard cricket fan learn new rules every other day. It is in light of this the game’s administrators have introduced new rules into the mix.

The administrators have decided to allow substitutes onto the cricket field. This is not the traditional substitutes whose only role is to field without any batting or bowling responsibility. This changed with the introduction of substitute if a player is ruled out of the game because of concussion. In the wake of the Philip Hughes tragedy, this was a welcome move. As was the decision to allow a substitute if a player is tested positive for Corona. However, the change the ICC is currently mulling and have even decided to introduce the change at the first class level is more drastic than they had ever introduced.

The ICC have allowed unqualified use of replacement players

“To better understand the implications of allowing players to be replaced during a match the definition of a First-Class Match will be changed to allow the unqualified use of replacement players.”

This essentially means that a team can bring onto the field of play whomever is required during that particular passage of play. If the wicket is turning, a spinner can be brought. If a batsman is seen to be struggling, he can be replaced with another batsman. Imagine a scenario. On the 5th day of the test and on the last session, a team is desperately trying to save the game and another team is desperately trying to win the game. The batting side is 7 down with only the bowlers left and suddenly the batting team decides to introduce 2 fresh batsman who are anyway better than the tailenders. The bowling side will feel cheated.

This is just one such scenario. They will be multiple scenarios when the rule is actually implemented.

Prithvi Shaw and Shubnam Gill

If this rule had been introduced in the recent India vs Australia series, Prithvi Shaw who was clearly a walking wicket, could have been replaced with Shubnam Gill right after the first innings. The ICC does not seem to have clarified whether there is a player limit to this rule. Whether only one player can be replaced or multiple players can be replaced? If that is not the case, it will lead to lot of hilarious situations. The entire playing eleven may end up being replaced with a new playing eleven.

The 11 who started the game may not necessarily complete the game. This rule change will mean that the captains are not always obliged to select the best possible eleven before the game. They will know that they can always introduced new players during the middle of the game. I will not welcome this change because it will only lead to lot of confusion and a feeling of betrayal.

No change in umpires call

This is one change the entire cricketing fraternity wanted removed but the ICC as usual decided not to remove this. They want to retain the human element in decision making.

 “The Cricket Committee had an excellent discussion around Umpire’s Call and analysed its use extensively,” committee chairman Kumble said.

“The principle underpinning DRS was to correct clear errors in the game whilst ensuring the role of the umpire as the decision maker on the field of play was preserved, bearing in mind the element of prediction involved with the technology.

“Umpire’s Call allows that to happen, which is why it is important it remains.”

This is as ridiculous as it sounds. The day technology was introduced, umpires seized to be the main arbiters. Nowadays, all the umpires are happy to send the decision to the third umpire. Even checking for no-ball is now in the purview of the third umpire and what sort of decision maker is Kumble talking about? Even runout decision, even if the batsman is well short of the crease or well inside the crease, the decision is taken by the third umpire.

The umpires call rule itself is that ridiculous. The batsman is either out or not out. If the ball hits the stumps or the bails, the batsman is out. If the ball misses, then he is not out. It is as simple as that. It is utter nonsense to retain umpires call despite multiple instances of how absurd it is. The compromise that the ICC has offered is that now the Wicket Zone is extended all the way upto the top of the bails. Come on ICC. Make the game simpler. You are going the other way and making the game much more complicated even for the fans from cricket playing nations to understand.

Other rules

It wasn’t all gloom. There were a couple of good decisions too. The captain can ask the umpire whether he thinks the batsman played a shot before signalling for review. This will help in the reviewing team not losing a DRS review.

The other is the additional DRS review per innings in all formats.

Conclusion

It is time the ICC simplifies the rules and not complicate them even further. The BCCI have removed soft signal from this year’s IPL and they will probably remove soft signal as well.

Other reads

ICC ranking system is completely flawed 1

ICC ranking system is completely flawed 2

ICC ranking system is completely flawed 3

Explore More

The not so much anticipated series

The not so much anticipated series

England vs South Africa has always been a series that is much anticipated. The games were contested keenly with both the teams emerging triumphant in the opponent’s country quite regularly.

The first Ashes Test Australia

The first Ashes Test Australia

Before you being reading the first Ashes Test Australia, please read England’s perspective. Let me jump to Australia First, they will be thrilled that they managed to win the Test

Some of cricket’s greatest rivalries

Cricket is a game that thrives on rivalries. Sport for that matter thrives on rivalries. Otherwise, there is no connect with the game. This article looks at some of cricket’s greatest rivalries. India vs Pakistan The India vs Pakistan cricket rivalry is one of the most intense sporting rivalries in the world. This rivalry goes beyond just the sport, with a long-standing political and cultural conflict between the two nations. Whenever these two teams meet on the cricket field, it is a high-pressure affair that is watched by millions of fans around the world. The history of the India-Pakistan cricket rivalry dates back to 1952, when the two teams played their first test match against each other. Since then, the two teams have played each other in a total of 199 matches, with India winning 131 and Pakistan winning 74. The two teams have also faced each other in six ICC World Cup matches, with India winning all six. The India-Pakistan cricket rivalry is known for its intense matches, with both teams fighting hard to win. One of the most memorable matches in the history of this rivalry was the 2007 T20 World Cup final, where India defeated Pakistan by just five runs. This match was watched by millions of fans around the world and is still talked about today. The India-Pakistan cricket rivalry is not just about the matches played on the field. The rivalry goes beyond cricket, with both countries having a long-standing political conflict. This conflict is reflected on the cricket field, with matches between these two nations often becoming heated affairs. The India-Pakistan cricket rivalry is also known for its passionate fans. Both countries have a huge fan base, with fans from both nations often traveling long distances to watch their team play. The matches between these two nations are always played in a packed stadium, with fans from both sides cheering their team on. In recent years, the India-Pakistan cricket rivalry has been affected by political tensions between the two nations. The two teams have not played a bilateral series since 2012, with their only meetings coming in ICC events. However, the rivalry between the two nations is still as intense as ever, with fans eagerly waiting for the next India-Pakistan match. In conclusion, the India vs Pakistan cricket rivalry is one of the most intense sporting rivalries in the world. It goes beyond just the sport, with a long-standing political and cultural conflict between the two nations. Matches between these two nations are always high-pressure affairs, watched by millions of fans around the world. Despite the political tensions between the two nations, the rivalry between India and Pakistan on the cricket field is still as intense as ever. England vs Australia The rivalry between England and Australia in cricket is one of the oldest and most intense in the sport. The two nations have been playing against each other for over a century, and their rivalry has become one of the most celebrated sporting rivalries in the world. The rivalry between England and Australia is often referred to as "The Ashes" due to the tiny urn that is awarded to the winning team of the Test series between the two nations. The Ashes series has been contested since 1882, and it is one of the most fiercely contested events in cricket. The rivalry between England and Australia is not just about cricket. It is a rivalry that goes beyond the sport, with a deep cultural and historical significance. England and Australia have a long history of political, economic, and cultural exchanges, which has influenced their cricket rivalry. The England vs Australia cricket rivalry is known for its fiercely competitive matches, with both teams fighting hard to win. The two teams have played each other in a total of 353 matches, with Australia winning 144 and England winning 109. The remaining matches have been drawn or tied. One of the most memorable moments in the history of the England vs Australia cricket rivalry was in the 2005 Ashes series. England won the series 2-1, with the fifth and final test match being one of the most intense and closely fought matches in the history of cricket. The match went down to the wire, with England winning by just two runs, which is still considered one of the greatest moments in the history of cricket. The England vs Australia cricket rivalry is also known for its passionate fans. Both nations have a huge fan base, and fans from both sides are known for their witty and at times ruthless banter during the matches. The Ashes series is played in packed stadiums, with fans from both sides cheering their team on. In conclusion, the England vs Australia cricket rivalry is one of the most intense and celebrated sporting rivalries in the world. The two nations have a deep cultural and historical significance, which has influenced their cricket rivalry. The Ashes series is fiercely contested, with both teams fighting hard to win. The rivalry between England and Australia is not just about cricket, it is a rivalry that goes beyond the sport, with a deep cultural and historical significance. South Africa vs Australia The rivalry between South Africa and Australia in cricket is one of the most intense and competitive in the sport. The two nations have a long history of playing against each other, and their rivalry is often marked by fiercely contested matches. The South Africa vs Australia cricket rivalry dates back to 1902, when the two nations played their first test match against each other. Since then, they have played a total of 104 test matches, with Australia winning 51 and South Africa winning 27. The remaining matches have been drawn. One of the most memorable moments in the history of the South Africa vs Australia cricket rivalry was in the 1999 Cricket World Cup semi-final. In a closely contested match, Australia defeated South Africa by just one run, which is still considered one of the greatest matches in the history of cricket. The South Africa vs Australia cricket rivalry is known for its fiercely competitive matches, with both teams fighting hard to win. The two teams have a similar style of play, which often results in high-scoring matches with fast-paced action. The South Africa vs Australia cricket rivalry is also marked by the intense atmosphere in which the matches are played. Both nations have passionate fans who fill up the stadiums and create a lively atmosphere. The matches between these two nations are always played in front of a packed stadium, with fans from both sides cheering their team on. In recent years, the South Africa vs Australia cricket rivalry has been affected by controversies and clashes between the players. In 2018, the ball-tampering scandal involving the Australian cricket team in a test match against South Africa created a huge controversy and strained the relations between the two nations. In conclusion, the South Africa vs Australia cricket rivalry is one of the most intense and competitive rivalries in the sport. The two nations have a long history of playing against each other, with matches often marked by fiercely contested action. The rivalry is known for its intense atmosphere and passionate fans, with matches played in front of a packed stadium. While controversies have sometimes strained relations between the two nations, the rivalry between South Africa and Australia on the cricket field remains one of the most fiercely contested in the sport.

Cricket is a game that thrives on rivalries. Sport for that matter thrives on rivalries. Otherwise, there is no connect with the game. This article looks at some of cricket’s