Cricket is a game that is played amongst a handful of teams and rightly so. It must stay that way probably forever. It is implicit that with only a few teams playing the game, every game remains competitive most of the time. Unfortunately, that is not always the case. There are far too many instances of lopsided contests throughout the history of the game. Yes, it certainly is not possible for every game to be highly competitive but a majority of them must be. However, that is not the case and hence, there is a huge responsibility on the bigger nations. Before that,

International test cricket must be restricted to a handful of nations

The shortest form of the game lasts for more than three hours. To put that into perspective, Hockey & Football lasts for a maximum of less than two hours if it goes into extra time. There are lot of Tennis games, especially involving women, that have lasted for less than an hour. Every other sport is less than 3 hours. On the otherhand, test cricket is over seven hours everyday and for 5 days. Not that many persons have the time to sit through that much time unless the game is really good.

Hence, it is absolutely imperative that a majority of the games are watchable. Now, this will require teams to be evenly matched and high on quality. There is a gulf of difference between the current top 3-4 teams and the rest. So much so that most of the series are one-sided. This must change and the bigger nations must help.

Test cricket is the ultimate

At the moment, there are 12 countries that play test cricket. A further 20 including the 12 plays ODIs. T20, there are a zillion countries that play but it does not really matter. What matters is ofcourse test cricket. It is the ultimate test of a player’s ability either as a batsman or as a bowler. With the pitch being flat for the limited overs throughout the world and the white ball that hardly swings, the batsmen always have a good time in those formats. However, when it comes to test cricket, a lot of things are challenging. The pitch as India and England are finding out now, the red ball, the catchers etc. Hence, let me concentrate on what sort of responsibility on the bigger nations is there.

Responsibility on the bigger nations

Some of the big nations like India, England, Australia, South Africa, New Zealand and Pakistan is having a huge role to play in terms of building the capabilities of other nations. I am not talking in terms of funds but in terms of opportunity. All of these nations have a robust first class structure. It is competitive enough. Infact, some of English or Indian first class teams are of the same quality as say a Zimbabwe or Ireland. It is not the fault of either of those countries because cricket is more or less an unknown quantity in those nations. There population is not that high which makes cricket playing population rather thin. They will have to work with whatever is available and ensure that the national team remains competitive. This is where the bigger nations come into the picture.

Teams that need help

Every nation mentioned above must allow a couple of teams from Sri Lanka, West Indies, Ireland, Afghanistan, Zimbabwe & Bangladesh to play in their local first class competition. The squad strength can be capped to a maximum of 20 players per team which gives 40 players an opportunity to further their cricketing education. In a country like India where there are more than 30 games every year per team, this will ensure that these teams play a lot of competitive games even if not of international quality, certainly better than their current strength.

Australian Sheffield Shield and English Country Championship is known for being of good quality and a total of 40 players from these nations will benefit from playing in such a structure. The players will be able to understand the nuances of the game. They will benefit from some of the professionals in the game. They can understand the fitness required to be able to compete at the highest level. The players will also benefit from some of the top fitness experts who are employed by various first class teams which in the case of some nations, severely lack.

With this much experience, teams like Ireland or Afghanistan will get sufficient experience to be able to play against the bigger nations on an even keel.

Conclusion

International cricket certainly cannot afford too many games that lacks competitive edge. Test cricket drags on for the whole day. Yes for the team winning, it will be good to watch but for the mutual observer, it will be boring. Already, games involving one of the bottom nation hardly make heads turn. One only will have to go back to the tests involving South Africa and Zimbabwe and the one involving India and Afghanistan. Those games finished in a little short of 2 days. Such was the gap in quality between the teams. These sort of games will happen regularly unless those players are given an opportunity to improve. Unfortunately, with the international schedule being too tight, it is not always possible for India or Australia or England or even South Africa and Pakistan to have a lengthy tour against those teams.

Explore More

The top and middle-order let India down – 3

Ravindra Jadeja Probably the most improved batsman in the world. I will write a separate blog about Jadeja. In this test, he showed why he is preferred to Ashwin though it was never between Jadeja and Ashwin. I have always said that Jadeja plays outside of India as a specialist batsman. Everyone knows that his bowling is non-threatening in English conditions. He may take advantage of a 5th day wearing pitch and that is about it. He paced his innings beautifully. The way he manipulated strike with the tail in the first innings was excellent. If only Pant had stayed with Jadeja, the lead could have been around the 450 mark. Shardul Thakur Shardul Thakur is not an express fast bowler. As such he can never terrorise any batsman with his pace. He is in the team in overseas conditions because he can contribute with the bat. If he fails with the bat and does not keep the economy rate down and provide breakthroughs, it is tough to justify his inclusion. After the enormous partnership between Pant and Jadeja, India needed one more partnership of 50-odd runs to establish authority over England. If only Shardul had stayed with Jadeja at the point, we may have well earned another 60-75 runs. A first innings score of close to 500 would have proved quite challenging but Shardul failed with the bat at the wrong time. Moreover, his bowling was not threatening and he missed an easy sitter of Stokes. Shardul was the star performer earlier in the series and as such this one bad game should not invite condemnation. However, Shardul must realise that he is in the team for his batting as much as he is for his bowling. In hindsight, would Ashwin had been a better choice than Shardul? Maybe may not be. The only reason that I am not able to emphatically say yes is the fact that there is no proof to the contrary. As Manjrekar rightly said, he is yet to take a 5-fer in the countries that matter. With age not on his side, it is anybody’s guess whether he will be able to correct that aberration. Mohammed Shami Shami is a brilliant bowler. We know that. Shami bowls some magic balls. We know that too. Shami makes the batsmen play more often. We know that one as well. Shami is unlucky. That is the problem. He is good and he does bowl lot of excellent deliveries but if they do not fetch frequent wickets, then there is a problem that needs to be identified. A couple of wickets in the second innings just when things started to look dicey for India, would have put the game firmly in India’s grasp. His record in England is a major concern. Just 38 wickets in 13 tests, under 3 per test is not the expected return from the premier fast bowler. It is unfortunate that despite his obvious talent, he has often failed to deliver against the major teams. This is the 3rd consecutive test that India failed to defend and Shami has a lot to contribute towards that dismal record. One good thing about Shami is that he showed maturity while batting in the first innings. He gave adequate support to Jadeja which is good to see. He played the short-balls much better than Shreyas. He will have to work with experts and see where is he going wrong? Does he have to pitch the ball much closer or short? Is the length the problem? Jasprit Bumrah The captain played a blinder and absolutely annihilated Broad. Sadly, it was with the bat. With the ball however, Bumrah once again failed at the crunch. He is quickly becoming the Kohli of bowling. For someone this talented, his match winning feats are less. He is the most protected Indian bowler. He has played all but just 2 of the games outside India. Bumrah is often given a break from tests in India. It makes sense because his action is so irregular that over-bowling may result in an injury but being the bowler the opposition plays cautiously and being the premier Indian bowler, to have failed to defend scores in the last innings on three successive occasions, it really casts a big question mark on his effectiveness. Whether all the pampering, is it really worth? The Edgbaston game was the 5th time in the last 10-12 tests that Bumrah did not raise to the occasion. It includes the WTC finals in conditions that is any fast bowler’s dream. Ofcourse, he picked up 5 wickets in the test but was still unable to break the Root-Bairstow partnership. I have written that he is becoming the Kohli of bowling. Kohli is similar in the sense that when faced with a target to chase, this is about Test cricket only, he is unable to win the game with his bat. He had a couple of opportunities in South Africa in 2017 and a couple more in England in 2017. Bumrah had this one apart from the two tests in South Africa, the WTC finals and the 2nd test in New Zealand. The last one was a long shot because the target was meagre. One thing to note is that he is not the rabbit with the bat anymore. He has certainly improved on that front but it is his bowling that is required. Mohammed Siraj Siraj usually is quite expensive. Even when he is among the wickets, he is expensive but even for him, this test would have been an awakening. He was literally taken apart by both Bairstow and Root. Towards the final stages, the way Bairstow toyed with him in the last over, any bowler would have been ashamed. These are early days and he has shown sufficient skill to become the mainstay but he must also realise that being the 3rd choice bowler, his chances will be limited when India play at home. Conclusion to the top and middle-order let India down This was a golden opportunity for India to win a series in England. Ofcourse, not when they were 98/5 but once a lead of 134 runs was secured, India must have accelerated quickly and must have built an impenetrable position. The negativity of Pujara, Vihari and to an extent Kohli and Jadeja, the recklessness of Pant, the inability of Gill to make a rare opportunity count and the impotence of the bowlers in the final innings meant that India were lucky that they had an upper hand for more than 60% of the game. Remember, we played with one player less because Shreyas is literally a free wicket. By the next time, India go over to England, some of these players would have retired and whether we will get another chance in the foreseeable future, is doubtful.

Before reading the top and middle-order let India down – 3, please read part 1 & 2 Ravindra Jadeja Probably the most improved batsman in the world. I will write

The ICC FTP cycle between 2023-2027

The ICC FTP cycle between 2023-2027

777 games. It simply is mindboggling. This is the total number of games that the ICC expects all the nations to play between 2023 – 2027. It is about 1

Delhi Capitals IPL 2023 review

Delhi Capitals IPL 2023 review

One more season done and one more disappointment. Alongwith RCB & Punjab, Delhi is the only side not to have won even a single IPL trophy in 16 attempts. Even