Tim Paine, the former Australian captain has resigned his captaincy following revelation about his lewd text messages to one of his female colleague about 4 years ago. He was exonerated at that time after an investigation but in the light of the said messages becoming public, he decided to leave the captaincy and as a result his place in the team itself is threatened. Is it correct to remove Paine from the team?

“Today I’m announcing my decision to stand down as the captain of the Australian Men’s Test team. It’s an incredibly difficult decision but the right one for me, my family and cricket.”

The decision came after allegations emerged of misconduct back in 2017.

“As a background on my decision, nearly four years ago, I was involved in a text exchange with a then-colleague,” Paine said. “At the time, the exchange was the subject of a thorough CA Integrity Unit investigation, throughout which I fully participated in and openly participated in.”

This was Paine’s private space

Inappropriate behaviour of a player is nothing new. Paine’s wasn’t first nor will it be the last. These things will continue. More so if the said player is popular and people tends to take advantage of that. People who may want get popular too quickly, might take a similar route. The point is that this was Paine’s private space. He made a mistake. A married man with 2 children must not have done what he did but it was completely private. If reports are to be believed, it was consensual too. The angle of immoral behaviour not befitting an Australian captain is put across. Whether Paine regrets his behaviour does not really matter at all. What happened has happened. There is no going back. This is where Cricket Australia must have stepped in to support Paine.

Paine cannot be accused of immoral behaviour on the field of play. He didn’t commit any crime that would have dragged the game into disrepute. Whatever he did was in the private confines of wherever he was at that time.

The case of Shane Warne

Years ago, Shane Warne, who could have become the greatest of Australian captain was never allowed to captain the Australian side, save for a few ODIs, because of his off-field shenanigans. The volume of his outlandish behaviour outside of the ground, the innumerable number of extramarital affairs was the sole reason he was never made the Australian captain. He was also involved in spot fixing and performance enhancing drugs just before the 2003 ODI World Cup. He was rightly banned for 12 months.

However, the real reason he wasn’t made the captain was because just before Ricky Ponting was made the permanent captain, Warne had an escapade with one of his family friend and was jettisoned from captain Australia ever. His performance on the field, his tactical nous, his brilliant decision making during the short stint he had been Australia’s ODI captain was never considered. Warne had all the qualities that would have made him a captain that other teams around the world would have envied. However, he was denied that opportunity. Though in Warne’s case, he did not lose his spot because of the off-field shenanigans.

Shane Warne has been compassionate with Paine

“It was sad to see what happened last Friday on so many levels and the circumstances in which Tim was forced to stand down. I really feel for him, what he’s going through, and what his family is going through,” Warne added.

“I’m not judging him on this incident. Just because Tim is in the public eye doesn’t mean he won’t make a mistake. Sportspersons are human, they have feelings. Let’s stop the judgement. It’s not our place to do that.”

The point is this act of Paine must not be the reason for him to be dropped. Yes, he deserved to be dropped from the team if his performance was not impressive. If his keeping is substandard and his batting is pretty ordinary. Yes, it is agreed that Paine is not a good batsman. Certainly not in the mould of Adam Gilchrist, the fellow Australian but it was because of his crucial 72 Australia won the first test at Adelaide against India in 2020. Otherwise, Australia could have lost the series 0-3 and that would have been devastating.

Ofcourse, his ill-advised chirps during the 3rd test at Sydney and the fact that Australia subsequently lost the series showed him to be stupid but his keeping remind tidy and batting decent enough for a wicket keeper batsman. It is a given that Paine would have walked in if it weren’t for this revelation. Australian board would not have thought of dropping him. This situation must not change that. If his keeping or batting deteriorates during the series, drop him by all means. He has already paid with his captaincy for his misdeeds but must not pay with his place too unless he deserves.

Shane Warne already has a replacement for Paine

“Inglis gets my vote. He’s got silky smooth hands behind the stumps, he’s a 360 degree player with the bat and coming off three first class hundreds last season for Western Australia. He’s a great team man who I saw first hand at the London Spirit this year. Get him in.”

Perhaps Warne will want to wait for few tests.

Cricket Tasmania is not taking it kindly about the treatment meted to Paine. They are really furious. Anger is palpable at Tasmania.

“In conversations I have had in recent days it is clear that the anger amongst the Tasmanian cricket community and general public is palpable,” Gaggin said. “Tim Paine has been a beacon for Australian cricket over the past four years and instrumental in salvaging the reputation of the national team after the calamity of Cape Town.

“Yet, at a time when [Cricket Australia] should have supported Tim, he was evidently regarded as dispensable. The treatment afforded to the Australian Test captain by Cricket Australia has been appalling, and the worst since Bill Lawry over 50 years ago.”

These are really strong words. If Paine is to be dropped from the Australian team, surely Tasmanian supporters will not be enthused.

The only question before Cricket Australia is that would they have dropped Paine from captaincy and from the team if his conversation had not been revealed?

Other Tim Paine related blogs can be read here and here.

Explore More

A bold and courageous decision

A bold and courageous decision

Right at the outset, a word of appreciation for the decision Gambhir took on the morning of the Sydney Test. Eversince the press conference the previous day, speculation was rife

The BGT negatives for India

The BGT negatives for India

Part one of BGT that focussed on the positives for India can be read here. There were far too many that it is difficult to even count them in one

Winning in Australia is so bloody tough 2

Not just the players but the spectators and the press will be involved The Australians hunt as a pack. From the time the visitors are in Australia, they are constantly reminded of how poor they are. The morning papers will ensure that the challengers are upto no good. They have merely turned up in Australia only to be smothered and humbled by the home team. Pages upon pages will be written by both the former players and the cricket correspondents showcasing how great the Australian team is and how soft the visitors are. This is unlike in England or India where the newspapers usually prop the visiting team. They derive pleasure in downplaying the home team. Not in Australia though. Once at the ground, every Aussie supporter will take lot of pleasure to abuse the visitors constantly. It is another story that they do not mind abusing their own Aussies but the adversary will cope a lot more. Just ask the Englishmen. They know because they have been at the receiving end for far too longer than anyone else. Once the spectators gets involved in the proceedings, it becomes doubly difficult for the adversary to concentrate and as a result, they will lose focus. The spectators usually make things a bit more easier for the Aussie bowlers. Sheer quality of the players Consider the following list of cricketers. Greg Blewett, Darren Lehmann, Tom Moody, Damien Martyn, Stuart Law, Ryan Harris, Michael Bevan, Stuart Clark. These are a set of players who did not get to play for Australia as many games as their talent commanded. Except for Martyn, who had a late career bloom, the rest did not get to play consistently. Grey Blewett had a fabulous initiation to Test Cricket but a few failures, he found himself out of the team and never got back. The rest, after a couple of games, they found themselves out of the team for no fault of theirs. These are cricketers who if they had qualified to play for any other country, would have enjoyed a long and prosperous career. Harris in a short career, bowled so outstandingly that the prime reason for Australia whitewashing England in 2013 was him though Johnson went away with all the credit. The following series in South Africa, Harris was outstanding again. If he had bowled alongwith McGrath, Australia would have not have lost even the meagre number of games that they did. It was a shame that the depth in Australian talent, did not allow a player of Harris’s ability to play lot more. Asia teams find it the most toughest It is the Asian countries consisting of India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and recently Afghanistan that find winning in Australia the toughest of their assignments. Not until recently, in 2018, has an Asian team gone on and won a series in Australia. That it took a weakened Australia and a good Indian team to win speaks volumes about the ability of Australia. Considering that India got Test status in 1932 and almost 100 years later, there have been just a couple of series wins by an Asian team. Both were achieved by India. It clearly shows how all the Asian teams never really liked touring Australia. Jayant Lele, the former Indian board selector, once said that India will lose all the tests during their 1999 tour which they promptly did but his comments conveyed the impression that it is not really worth to select a team for Australia. Absolutely no ground in Asia carry any pace and bounce. Leave alone equivalent to Australian grounds. Except for Pakistan, none of the other teams are blessed with pace bowlers. That is another handicap. You just cannot compete in Australia with slow bowlers and spinners. This is what the rest of the countries possess. The batsmen are not exposed to good fast bowlers and that is a major handicap. As a result, all the Asian batsmen without exception, find facing the Australian bowlers difficult. The height of the Aussie bowlers too play a crucial role because the point of delivery is quite high. Body language of the Aussies The moment Australians step onto the field, they exude confidence. Even the most uncompetitive Australian team have proven resilient against their adversary. The post ball-tampering team is an example. They were expected to lose the series to India in 2018 which they did but not before they won one at Perth. Sports is ingrained in the Aussie system Sports is something that is ingrained in the Aussie system. Rod Laver remains the only Tennis player who has won all the 4 Grand Slams in the same year, twice. Until recently, Ian Thorpe has won the most number of medals in Olympics. Daniel Riccardio & Mark Webber are a creditable Formula One drivers. Evonne Goolagong, the world’s first mother to win a Wimbledon title. At present, Nick Kyrgios is among the top players in the world. The point is, the Australian men and women take sports seriously in much the same way the Indians take education seriously. Wrapping up winning in Australia is so bloody tough Australia still remains a bloody tough country to win. There is no doubt about that. The recent Ashes series, in 2020, where they just blew away England being a case in point. Joe Root, one of the excellent modern day batsman, is yet to score a hundred in Australia. He has scored runs everywhere else. Only the toughest can survive in Australia and it is not a country for the faint-hearted. Other Australia related blogs Adelaide Test Review Critical Australian Public Shane Warne 1 & 2 Adam Gilchrist About Ashes 2021

Before you go onto read Winning in Australia is so bloody tough 2, please read part 1 here Not just the players but the spectators and the press will be