We have witnessed a wonderful series full of twists and turns right till the end. The series is truly one for the ages. This series have resurrected the faith of the loyal fans on Test cricket. The series provided enough drama that no T20 or ODI will be able to provide. The pride of winning a test match can be seen on the players clearly. The satisfaction that the teams derive out of winning a test is next to none because it is that hard. Especially, when 2 teams of equal competence is at it. This is India vs Australia series review.

After the chastening defeat at Adelaide, a majority, including this writer, never gave India a chance. It was just a question of time before India loses all the 4 tests. Such was the magnitude of the defeat at Adelaide. Being bowled out for 36 runs, any team will be deflated and would want to pack their bags and go home. Former Australian players were dismissive of the Indian team. It was hard not to agree with them afterall, the Indian team performed rather poorly in the first test. However, the comeback was something most of us did not expect.

Over the last 20 years, India have this habit of winning atleast one test in SENA countries. This is a welcome change from the previous century when winning outside of India was very rare. The only exception was the 2018 tour to Australia when we won 2 tests. I did expect India to win in Sydney and I thought that will be that but they showed nerves of steel to win 2 tests including one at the Gabbatoir.

Statements made by the Indian team

The Indian team made quite a few statements from this tour. First, the team showed that it is not depended on Kohli alone to score runs. Second, the team proved that it does not require the abusive brand of cricket that Kohli often displays on the field to win tests. Third, it has loads of steel and determination to overcome severe odds. Fourth, the bench strength is strong that anyone can replace anyone in the team.

Gains for India

The gains for India from this tour is quite impressive and there were some disappointments too. Shubnam Gill, the Punjab batsman was always thought to be someone with loads of talent. It was a pity the Indian management chose to go with Prithvi Shaw instead of Gill in the first test. Infact, before the first test, Gavaskar & Border were full of praise for Gill for the way he played in the practise games. However, he wasn’t picked in the team for Adelaide. Better sense prevailed and from Melbourne, Gill showed his class and why he is rated so highly. He didn’t show any nerve for someone so young playing against an excellent bowling attack in their own country. The horizontal bat shots and the drives were all pleasing to watch. He has certainly booked his place for the foreseeable future.

Rishab Pant

The diminutive wicket keeper had such a horrible IPL that he wasn’t even considered for the first test. He was low in confidence after he lost his place from all the three formats. Eventually, because Saha wasn’t able to bat well and Kohli went home, Pant was brought in. He showed why he must be considered as an automatic pick. The flair and the confidence that he displayed at Sydney and the flamboyance at Brisbane did not seem like someone who has hardly played 15 games.

An hour of Pant at Sydney, India may have won that game too. In such a short career so far, Pant has already played a match winning knock in the fourth innings. This is a feat that is still eluding Kohli and eluded Tendulkar for a greater part of his career. However, Pant will have to improve his keeping or give up the keeping gloves and become a pure batsman. With his brand of cricket he will succeed in Tests but may not be that good in the short format.

Washington Sundar

I must confess that I never rated Sundar as a cricketer leave alone an international player but the way he batted, every top order batsman will be proud of the shots. The silken cover drives, the compact defence and the horizontal bat shots were a treat to watch. At 21, he has lot of cricket. He may want to improve his bowling skills if he has to replace Ashwin who is 13 years older than Sundar.

Shardul Thakur

Another cricketer I didn’t rate higher. I still do not rate his bowling but his batting was a revelation. At 29 years, he is not young and combined with the competition for bowlers, he may not get to play too many tests though he might get to play in the shorter formats.

Mohammed Siraj

Rather surprisingly, Siraj emerged as the highest wicket taker for India. He bowled some lovely deliveries. However, he was down on pace because I have seen him bowl at 147KMPH in the IPL. With the imminent return of Bumrah, Ishant & Shami, it is hard to fit in Siraj in the playing eleven but he will be around the team for a longtime. With India set to play 9 tests within the next 8 months, Siraj will need to be rotated with the other bowlers. If only he can bowl at 145, he will be an excellent addition to the team.

In praise of the support staff

The support staff deserves special mention. Ravi Shastri, Arun, Rathore and all other staff must be commended as well. They must have cajoled a team that would have been pretty low in confidence after Adelaide and have made the players believe in themselves. Far too long, the Indian team were searching for one all-rounder but now we have 6.

India have become only the 2nd team to have won two consecutive series in Australia over the last 30 years. The other being South Africa. This is a meritorious achievement. It is extremely difficult to defeat Australia in their own country however weak they maybe. Now, the 2018 win will not be considered an aberration. Having said that, India still needs to win in South Africa, England during this year and in New Zealand whenever they get a chance to be considered the undisputed number one.

Other articles related to the Australian tour can be read here, here and here.

Explore More

England managed to keep Ashes alive

The whole of England would have screamed The Ashes is alive, The Ashes is alive, The Ashes is alive. Well, it is indeed alive. England fought back really well and ensured that they live to fight another day. The action at Headingley, the scene of Ben Stokes’s previous exploits, was riveting. The tension was palpable on the face of everyone watching the game. There were multiple heroes for both England and Australia. England will be the more happier of the 2 teams who were fighting for The Ashes. The victory was fashioned not by Stokes but by a bloke who is just in his first year in international cricket and a fast bowler, who should have been in the starting eleven right from Edgbaston. How did England managed to keep Ashes alive? The inclusion of Mark Wood He has got pace. He runs in hard and is not shy of releasing the ball at uncomfortable speeds. That, he wasn’t part of the England team from Edgbaston is for me, an unpardonable oversight unless he was injured. Wood’s pace and movement after pitching clearly unsettled every Australian player. I have been advocating for Wood to be included in every game until the series is decided. Ofcourse, it makes sense to protect such a precious asset but why wouldn’t you want to make use of his services when the series is alive? Does anyone think that without Wood, England would still have won and that too after the infamous Bairstow incident at Lords? I doubt it. Wood was clearly the difference between the 2 sides. Cummins who looked quite comfortable and assured of himself with the bat at Edgbaston and Lords, suddenly turned into a nervous wreck. Not just Cummins, the entire Australian tail was weary of facing upto Wood. They were afraid of getting hit by one of his thunderbolts. For once, Ollie Robinson’s words came true. Johnny Bairstow continues to flounder If only Bairstow had held onto the chances, England by now would have been leading 2-1 and not the otherway around. His keeping is not at all international standard. He misses every regulation nick and yet, he is persisted with for his batting. I am not advocating for Bairstow to be dropped but he must be relieved of his wicket-keeping duties. All the 3 games were won the Australia and England by small margins. As such, England cannot afford anymore largesse. It is another matter if England is short of good keepers but in Foakes, they have a worldclass keeper. Ollie Robinson will definitely not play at Old Trafford. It gives a good chance to bring Foakes back to keep wickets. Bairstow will probably be relieved to concentrate on batting alone. It may even unleash the beast within Bairstow. Let us remember that all those match-winning innings that Bairstow played last year, he wasn’t keeping wickets then. His replacement, Harry Brook, has gone on from strength to strength and cannot be dropped. Stokes has a tricky decision to make. Does he risk Ashes by persisting with Bairstow as the keeper or does he solidify the team with the inclusion of a brilliant wicket-keeper? It will shorten the bowling but Broad, Woakes, Wood, Moeen and if needed Stokes and Root will be able to bowl the necessary overs. If Bairstow continues to keep, probably one more Australian might tell him that “you have just dropped the Ashes” Boycott wants him dropped “England took a calculated gamble and it hasn’t worked,” wrote Boycott. “In three Tests he has dropped catches, missed a stumping and can’t score any runs. It is very sad and outwardly he may show he is upbeat and full of exuberance, but when you fail on the big stage in the full glare of publicity there is nowhere to hide and deep down it affects your confidence. Someone needs to be brave for him and take him out of the limelight. Well, I will not go that far. However, I certainly want him replaced as the keeper. Bairstow can continue as a batsman. Harry Brook showed his quality He has the potential to become one of the best batsmen of his era. He displayed remarkable composure under extreme pressure. Brook curbed his natural instinct to bat aggressively and decisively. The situation called for restraint and accumulation. In the company of Woakes, Brook showed what he is made of. England have really found a worthy successor to Root. Australia need not be disheartened The positives for Australia far outweigh the negatives. The excellent comeback of Mitchell Marsh, who may very well have played a match-winning innings if not for lack of support from the other end. Australia will now be very much unsure as to whom to pick. Whether they will have to go back to Green or do they continue with Marsh? Green has been seen as the future of Australian cricket and in the limited exposure, has not done anything wrong to be dropped. He is an excellent fielder at gully. It will make sense to continue with Green. Australia’s real problem is at the top. David Warner. 17 times he has fallen to Broad. Broad is not going anywhere. He will play the final couple of Tests. As such, he will relish the prospect of bowling to Warner. The only saving grace for Warner is that Australia does not have a reserve opener. Head opened in India but he has been so successful at number 5 that it does not really make any sense to move him up the order. Labuschagne himself is not among the runs and he is unlikely to. It leaves Mitchell Marsh to open the innings. I do not know whether he has opened even in Shield cricket but to do that in an international game needs a lot of courage. This could also be Marsh’s only opportunity to force himself into the side. If asked, I probably suspect that he will agree. Wrapping up England managed to keep Ashes alive It is not all doom and gloom for Australia. The momentum hasn’t shifted. This loss was always on the cards given the pressure on England. It took the brilliant bowling of Wood to unsettle them. They will be better off for this exposure

The whole of England would have screamed The Ashes is alive, The Ashes is alive, The Ashes is alive. Well, it is indeed alive. England fought back really well and

Royal Challengers Bangalore IPL Preview

Royal Challengers Bangalore IPL Preview

The Royal Challengers Bangalore will be under all sorts of pressure this season because of the success of their counterparts in the just concluded WPL. It has been 16 years

The BCCI have found a genuine model

The BCCI have found a genuine model

“India is supposed to go to Sri Lanka for three ODIs and five T20Is”. These were the words of the BCCI president Saurav Ganguly. It definitely came as a bolt