There was a time when England were always bothered against Pakistan. It could be in England or it could be in Pakistan. They had a mental block that just did not go away whenever they were up against Pakistan. Somehow, Pakistan managed to find that additional energy when it came to England. Things have, however, changed over the last 5 years. Not only England are not scared of Pakistan but they have begun to dominate them in a way only a few teams have done in the past. The Multan win was one such instance of England displaying their might. Fashioning such a win was something extraordinary. Though it was on the back of a couple of fabulous innings from Root and Brook, the bowlers too much be credited for the victory.

Pakistan did this the last time around. A couple of years ago, the pitches in all the 3 Tests between these two teams in Pakistan were plain batting tracks. Runs were there for the taking. The bowlers were never in the picture. All the batsmen had to do was just stay on the wicket, the runs will come. The Pakistan team, the board and the curators basically wanted Pakistan to draw the games for which such placid tracks will help. It would have been alright for the England of the past but the present England team, which specialises on Bazball, this is a wrong strategy.

Not looking to draw games

They do not play for draws anymore. They are intent on winning every game and are prepared to risk losing inorder to win. The attitude shift has been brought about by Ben Stokes and Brendan McCullum. It does not mean that the players were not to be credited but the fact that they brought into the scheme of things, meant that all of them could express themselves and would not be reprimanded for any fault. This is the attitude that the English players carried onto the field at Multan too and this was the trap that Pakistan fell into. They did not learn the lessons from the last series. Against the power hitters of England, preparing batting track is equal to suicide. Which insane fellow asked for such pitches is beyond me.

Did they want to help Babar Azam and the rest to score runs and thereby increase their averages? Did they want to help Babar Azam in particular so that he can be counted among the greats of the game? I do not know. What I know for sure is that on such pitches, against the poor quality of Pakistan’s bowlers, they were asking for trouble.

The sheer pace

The sheer pace of batting left the Pakistan team crumbled. They spent three days on the field running after the ball to all parts of the ground. England scored 478 runs from ones and twos. As a result, the players who batted in the 2nd innings were a bunch of tired legs.

Woakes said, “Here in the subcontinent, you can have three supposedly dull days and then the game can happen quickly. That was always the plan: once we were able to get ahead and run them ragged in the field, it was always going to be hard for them, even on that surface.”

If the opposition is not careful about the scoring rate, England will quickly runaway with the game. Especially, if the pitch does not crumble, their opposition will have serious problem because of the sheer scoring rate. Whether a pitch that helped the spinners would have paved a win for Pakistan is another question because I don’t think they have the quality of players to win against England but atleast it would have lessen the pain of such hammering.

Joe Root and the purple patch

Root went past Cook during the course of the innings and became the highest run scorer for England. This is hard to imagine until a few years ago. Towards the end of 2020, Root’s average was at an all-time low of 47. His average between 2018 and 2020 was less than 40. There were suggestions that he just did not belong to the level of Kohli, Smith and Williamson. More than 4000 runs since then including 18 hundreds has left Root as the most consistent batsman during this period. The next is Karunaratne with just over 2000 runs. Smith, Williamson and Kohli, who are his compatriots when it comes to the marketing gimmick of fab-4, are nowhere to be seen.

Having said that, has Root really cemented his legacy? Only time can answer. The next year’s Ashes in Australia, which will be his last in that country, will be his final opportunity to correct an anomaly. He hasn’t scored a single hundred in Australia. With the prospect of 10 innings, if he returns without a single hundred, his reputation will be tarnished forever. With captaincy of his chest and the confidence of runs behind him, the odds are for him to succeed finally.

Harry Brook is another batsman to watch out for. He has developed a liking for Pakistan. So much so that, 4 of his hundreds, including the mammoth triple, have come against them in that country.

Wrapping up fashioning such a win

England’s series results under McCullum have been a mixed bag. They have beaten teams they would expect to, drawn with Australia, and lost heavily in India earlier this year but it is their style and approach that has made them such a compelling team to watch. This display at Multan will only reemphasise their approach to Bazball cricket. It has worked like a charm against most of the teams.

Other blogs

https://icricketcritique.com/england-vs-pakistan-series-to-forget/
https://icricketcritique.com/pakistan-lost-because-of-their-own-stupidity/

Explore More

Bazball has just landed in New Zealand

Bazball has just landed in New Zealand

England and New Zealand will begin a series on the 16th of February. It is an extremely short series. It is so short that if you blink you will miss

Spirit of Cricket and Bairstow

Spirit of Cricket and Bairstow

Bairstow was stumped after he sleepwalked on the final day at Lords’. There was a huge uproar for every English supporter. Everyone invoked the spirit of cricket and absolutely pounced

England managed to keep Ashes alive

The whole of England would have screamed The Ashes is alive, The Ashes is alive, The Ashes is alive. Well, it is indeed alive. England fought back really well and ensured that they live to fight another day. The action at Headingley, the scene of Ben Stokes’s previous exploits, was riveting. The tension was palpable on the face of everyone watching the game. There were multiple heroes for both England and Australia. England will be the more happier of the 2 teams who were fighting for The Ashes. The victory was fashioned not by Stokes but by a bloke who is just in his first year in international cricket and a fast bowler, who should have been in the starting eleven right from Edgbaston. How did England managed to keep Ashes alive? The inclusion of Mark Wood He has got pace. He runs in hard and is not shy of releasing the ball at uncomfortable speeds. That, he wasn’t part of the England team from Edgbaston is for me, an unpardonable oversight unless he was injured. Wood’s pace and movement after pitching clearly unsettled every Australian player. I have been advocating for Wood to be included in every game until the series is decided. Ofcourse, it makes sense to protect such a precious asset but why wouldn’t you want to make use of his services when the series is alive? Does anyone think that without Wood, England would still have won and that too after the infamous Bairstow incident at Lords? I doubt it. Wood was clearly the difference between the 2 sides. Cummins who looked quite comfortable and assured of himself with the bat at Edgbaston and Lords, suddenly turned into a nervous wreck. Not just Cummins, the entire Australian tail was weary of facing upto Wood. They were afraid of getting hit by one of his thunderbolts. For once, Ollie Robinson’s words came true. Johnny Bairstow continues to flounder If only Bairstow had held onto the chances, England by now would have been leading 2-1 and not the otherway around. His keeping is not at all international standard. He misses every regulation nick and yet, he is persisted with for his batting. I am not advocating for Bairstow to be dropped but he must be relieved of his wicket-keeping duties. All the 3 games were won the Australia and England by small margins. As such, England cannot afford anymore largesse. It is another matter if England is short of good keepers but in Foakes, they have a worldclass keeper. Ollie Robinson will definitely not play at Old Trafford. It gives a good chance to bring Foakes back to keep wickets. Bairstow will probably be relieved to concentrate on batting alone. It may even unleash the beast within Bairstow. Let us remember that all those match-winning innings that Bairstow played last year, he wasn’t keeping wickets then. His replacement, Harry Brook, has gone on from strength to strength and cannot be dropped. Stokes has a tricky decision to make. Does he risk Ashes by persisting with Bairstow as the keeper or does he solidify the team with the inclusion of a brilliant wicket-keeper? It will shorten the bowling but Broad, Woakes, Wood, Moeen and if needed Stokes and Root will be able to bowl the necessary overs. If Bairstow continues to keep, probably one more Australian might tell him that “you have just dropped the Ashes” Boycott wants him dropped “England took a calculated gamble and it hasn’t worked,” wrote Boycott. “In three Tests he has dropped catches, missed a stumping and can’t score any runs. It is very sad and outwardly he may show he is upbeat and full of exuberance, but when you fail on the big stage in the full glare of publicity there is nowhere to hide and deep down it affects your confidence. Someone needs to be brave for him and take him out of the limelight. Well, I will not go that far. However, I certainly want him replaced as the keeper. Bairstow can continue as a batsman. Harry Brook showed his quality He has the potential to become one of the best batsmen of his era. He displayed remarkable composure under extreme pressure. Brook curbed his natural instinct to bat aggressively and decisively. The situation called for restraint and accumulation. In the company of Woakes, Brook showed what he is made of. England have really found a worthy successor to Root. Australia need not be disheartened The positives for Australia far outweigh the negatives. The excellent comeback of Mitchell Marsh, who may very well have played a match-winning innings if not for lack of support from the other end. Australia will now be very much unsure as to whom to pick. Whether they will have to go back to Green or do they continue with Marsh? Green has been seen as the future of Australian cricket and in the limited exposure, has not done anything wrong to be dropped. He is an excellent fielder at gully. It will make sense to continue with Green. Australia’s real problem is at the top. David Warner. 17 times he has fallen to Broad. Broad is not going anywhere. He will play the final couple of Tests. As such, he will relish the prospect of bowling to Warner. The only saving grace for Warner is that Australia does not have a reserve opener. Head opened in India but he has been so successful at number 5 that it does not really make any sense to move him up the order. Labuschagne himself is not among the runs and he is unlikely to. It leaves Mitchell Marsh to open the innings. I do not know whether he has opened even in Shield cricket but to do that in an international game needs a lot of courage. This could also be Marsh’s only opportunity to force himself into the side. If asked, I probably suspect that he will agree. Wrapping up England managed to keep Ashes alive It is not all doom and gloom for Australia. The momentum hasn’t shifted. This loss was always on the cards given the pressure on England. It took the brilliant bowling of Wood to unsettle them. They will be better off for this exposure

The whole of England would have screamed The Ashes is alive, The Ashes is alive, The Ashes is alive. Well, it is indeed alive. England fought back really well and