2013 Ashes. England were doing well against Australia for a short period. Infact, they dominated the exchange between the teams in 3 consecutive series. This led to complacency. England toured Australia in 2013 and they expected everything to fall in place and that they will win the Ashes easily. What transpired was different. Australia wanted to win the series more than England did. They cannot digest the fact that if they had lost, it would be the first time England would have won 4 consecutive series. Except for Clarke, England did not rate anyone else. However, they ignored certain warning signs before the series. This is Boycott about the 2013 Ashes.

They weren’t scoring huge first innings runs which very much dictates the course of the game. England drew a series in New Zealand that they must have lost. Though they won 3-0 against Australia, the games were much more closer than the scoreline reveals. Lehmann became the Australian coach during the summer series. He picked Steve Smith who repaid the faith with a hundred at The Oval and a couple more in the return series. Mitchell Johnson too was picked for the ODI series from obscurity and he proved to be the chief destroyer of England in the return series in Australia.

Mistakes made by Flower

Andy Flower overlooked the threat Johnson could pose. In that ODI series, Johnson bowled fast, accurate and at the throat of the English batsmen. He was unplayable. However, neither Gooch nor Flower took any note of him. Perhaps, the previous tour during which Johnson was poor, influenced them. In the interim, Johnson worked with Dennis Lillee and Terry Alderman who perfected his bowling action. If Flower had watched the ODIs, he would have seen the big problem brewing in the form of Johnson. In 1990, Mickey Stewart, the England coach called on the services of Boycott to prepare the English batsmen for the West Indian fast bowlers.

He asked the bowlers to bowl full tilt from a reduced pitch length and also showed the batsmen how to duck, weave and defend. The idea was to prepare the players mentally to face fast and aggressive short-ball bowling. If you survive the barrage of the fast bowlers, he will eventually pitch one up that can be stroked for a boundary.

Lack of strategy

Boycott feels that England helped Johnson by not having a cohesive strategy. In Australia, Boycott saw Gooch, the batting coach, giving them a lot of throw-downs but that is not the work of a coach. A coach must study the technique of the batsmen, tidy up their defense and talk to them about where and how to play certain bowlers. Point to the low-risk scoring areas that offer greater rewards. Added to a lack of braveness against Johnson, England gave away a lot of wickets to Lyon. They played him from inside the crease and were virtually shot-less. Joe Root, who was a youngster at that time, fared poorly. He did not come on the front foot as often as it was necessary and was eventually dropped for the last game.

Australia planned well for Alastair Cook who was strong on the on-side. They bowled on the off and outside the off stump so that he remained scoreless. This played on Cook’s mind. It forced him to play shots that he wasn’t comfortable with. The result was there for all to see.

Mental health

Off the field, England lost the services of Trott who suffered from mental health. Flower knew about this problem and was managing it but apparently poorly. Trott retired after the first test. The stress and the pressure were too much for him to bear. England’s treatment of Steve Finn was abysmal. He was a genuine quick who could turn the game around in a matter of overs. His action, his run up and anything else was changed which ultimately led to his drop in confidence. It became so bad that he was sent home from the ODI squad because Giles termed him “not selectable”. England picked 3 tall fast bowlers in the hope of terrorising the Aussie batsmen but Finn became no selectable, Tremlett lost a lot of pace before the series and Rankin was not Test match material.

Swann during the tour was just a shadow of the excellent bowler he was. Swann had an elbow operation in 2013 and ever since, he wasn’t the same bowler. He himself admitted that after retiring. Boycott felt that once Swann retired, he must have been asked to remain with the squad till the end of the series. However, Flower discarded his service once he retired. Panesar was about to make his debut but Swann wasn’t around to give him advise. Flower told Swann that if he is not going to play, he cannot stay with the squad.

Far too many support staff

The England squad of 2013, had 16 support staff. What was the need? Everything about the players was controlled. Flower was here, there and everywhere. He completely controlled the England cricketers. Far too many support staff will make the players stop thinking for themselves if they are offered advise on everything. An 82-page document that showed what the players can eat and what they cannot, made the English team a laughing stock. This was sent in advance to Australia for preparation. This was prepared by an England Chief Nutritionist, Chris Rosimus. Has he even adorned the whites? This sort of micro-management will only make the players feel miserable. Everything showed in the ultimate result. England were routed 0-5.

Chapters 1 & 2

Boycott about cancer struggle

Boycott about cancer treatment

Boycott and the Packer saga

Boycott about his friend Clough

Boycott about sledging

Boycott about 2013 Ashes

Explore More

Something is wrong with Sri Lankan cricket

Something is wrong with Sri Lankan cricket

It will merely be an understatement to state that Sri Lankan cricket is struggling. Long since Sangakkara retired, Sri Lankan cricket has gone into a tailspin. The rot is well

A thorough and marvellous English performance

A thorough and marvellous English performance

England has just blanked New Zealand 3-0. It is not the win itself that merits attention but the manner of those wins that demands our attention. New Zealand is the

England managed to keep Ashes alive

The whole of England would have screamed The Ashes is alive, The Ashes is alive, The Ashes is alive. Well, it is indeed alive. England fought back really well and ensured that they live to fight another day. The action at Headingley, the scene of Ben Stokes’s previous exploits, was riveting. The tension was palpable on the face of everyone watching the game. There were multiple heroes for both England and Australia. England will be the more happier of the 2 teams who were fighting for The Ashes. The victory was fashioned not by Stokes but by a bloke who is just in his first year in international cricket and a fast bowler, who should have been in the starting eleven right from Edgbaston. How did England managed to keep Ashes alive? The inclusion of Mark Wood He has got pace. He runs in hard and is not shy of releasing the ball at uncomfortable speeds. That, he wasn’t part of the England team from Edgbaston is for me, an unpardonable oversight unless he was injured. Wood’s pace and movement after pitching clearly unsettled every Australian player. I have been advocating for Wood to be included in every game until the series is decided. Ofcourse, it makes sense to protect such a precious asset but why wouldn’t you want to make use of his services when the series is alive? Does anyone think that without Wood, England would still have won and that too after the infamous Bairstow incident at Lords? I doubt it. Wood was clearly the difference between the 2 sides. Cummins who looked quite comfortable and assured of himself with the bat at Edgbaston and Lords, suddenly turned into a nervous wreck. Not just Cummins, the entire Australian tail was weary of facing upto Wood. They were afraid of getting hit by one of his thunderbolts. For once, Ollie Robinson’s words came true. Johnny Bairstow continues to flounder If only Bairstow had held onto the chances, England by now would have been leading 2-1 and not the otherway around. His keeping is not at all international standard. He misses every regulation nick and yet, he is persisted with for his batting. I am not advocating for Bairstow to be dropped but he must be relieved of his wicket-keeping duties. All the 3 games were won the Australia and England by small margins. As such, England cannot afford anymore largesse. It is another matter if England is short of good keepers but in Foakes, they have a worldclass keeper. Ollie Robinson will definitely not play at Old Trafford. It gives a good chance to bring Foakes back to keep wickets. Bairstow will probably be relieved to concentrate on batting alone. It may even unleash the beast within Bairstow. Let us remember that all those match-winning innings that Bairstow played last year, he wasn’t keeping wickets then. His replacement, Harry Brook, has gone on from strength to strength and cannot be dropped. Stokes has a tricky decision to make. Does he risk Ashes by persisting with Bairstow as the keeper or does he solidify the team with the inclusion of a brilliant wicket-keeper? It will shorten the bowling but Broad, Woakes, Wood, Moeen and if needed Stokes and Root will be able to bowl the necessary overs. If Bairstow continues to keep, probably one more Australian might tell him that “you have just dropped the Ashes” Boycott wants him dropped “England took a calculated gamble and it hasn’t worked,” wrote Boycott. “In three Tests he has dropped catches, missed a stumping and can’t score any runs. It is very sad and outwardly he may show he is upbeat and full of exuberance, but when you fail on the big stage in the full glare of publicity there is nowhere to hide and deep down it affects your confidence. Someone needs to be brave for him and take him out of the limelight. Well, I will not go that far. However, I certainly want him replaced as the keeper. Bairstow can continue as a batsman. Harry Brook showed his quality He has the potential to become one of the best batsmen of his era. He displayed remarkable composure under extreme pressure. Brook curbed his natural instinct to bat aggressively and decisively. The situation called for restraint and accumulation. In the company of Woakes, Brook showed what he is made of. England have really found a worthy successor to Root. Australia need not be disheartened The positives for Australia far outweigh the negatives. The excellent comeback of Mitchell Marsh, who may very well have played a match-winning innings if not for lack of support from the other end. Australia will now be very much unsure as to whom to pick. Whether they will have to go back to Green or do they continue with Marsh? Green has been seen as the future of Australian cricket and in the limited exposure, has not done anything wrong to be dropped. He is an excellent fielder at gully. It will make sense to continue with Green. Australia’s real problem is at the top. David Warner. 17 times he has fallen to Broad. Broad is not going anywhere. He will play the final couple of Tests. As such, he will relish the prospect of bowling to Warner. The only saving grace for Warner is that Australia does not have a reserve opener. Head opened in India but he has been so successful at number 5 that it does not really make any sense to move him up the order. Labuschagne himself is not among the runs and he is unlikely to. It leaves Mitchell Marsh to open the innings. I do not know whether he has opened even in Shield cricket but to do that in an international game needs a lot of courage. This could also be Marsh’s only opportunity to force himself into the side. If asked, I probably suspect that he will agree. Wrapping up England managed to keep Ashes alive It is not all doom and gloom for Australia. The momentum hasn’t shifted. This loss was always on the cards given the pressure on England. It took the brilliant bowling of Wood to unsettle them. They will be better off for this exposure

The whole of England would have screamed The Ashes is alive, The Ashes is alive, The Ashes is alive. Well, it is indeed alive. England fought back really well and