Lyon about CA and BCCI

I understand that the title Lyon about CA and BCCI must be slightly misleading because one will feel that Nathan Lyon, the brilliant Australian spinner, has said something about both Cricket Australia and the Board of Control for Cricket in India. The first part is correct. He has criticised Cricket Australia. I have included BCCI in this because the thought of any active cricketer criticising the Indian board is unfathomable. Let me try to explain in Lyon about CA and BCCI.

Indian cricketers are not known for being vocal against the board. This is not new. Ever since the BCCI became the current behemoth, anyone and everyone is afraid of raising their voice against the board. The Indian board simply does not allow it. Leave alone dissent, they cannot tolerate even the minute bit of criticism coming their way. They always seem to think that they are beyond any commoner and that a divine right has been bestowed upon them. They seem to think that they are above criticism and that they are absolutely blameless.

I have never seen or read any Indian player, be it Kapil Dev or Gavaskar in the 1970s and 80s or Tendulkar, Dhoni or Kohli say anything against the board even when they deserve it. The reason I have mentioned these players is because they were during their playing days, the absolute star cricketers whom the board will not dare. Yet, they never found it necessary to speak up when the situation warranted.

Lyon’s comments about Cricket Australia

Lyon was contracted by Lancashire to play the entire season of the English County Championship. However, Cricket Australia stepped in and limited his tenure for only 6 games.

“Yeah, it’s definitely not my call,” Lyon told BBC Lancashire.

“That’s the nature of the beast. It’s a business now and Cricket Australia have come over the top and said they want to manage me and hopefully extend my playing career for the next three to four years, whatever it may be.

“It’s disappointing, because I signed here wanting to play all games and even play some T20 cricket and was thoroughly looking forward to that.

“But it is what it is and my hands are tied.”

Lyon does not have any cricket to play until India reaches the shores of Australia towards the end of this year. It would have been perfect for him to play the entire season and keep himself fit and in form. Cricket Australia in the garb of wanting to extend his career has cut short his tenure. Lyon is thoroughly justified in venting his frustration against the parent body.

The case of the ICL

How can anyone forget the case of the ICL? Indian Cricket League that was promoted by Zee Network. This was the precursor to the IPL. When Zee announced this tournament, they invited international cricketers from across the world to participate. Unknown to them at that time, several top international cricketers signed up for the tournament in the hope of making fair amount of money in a short time. How did the BCCI respond to this tournament? It was savage. First, they refused permission to the league on any of the grounds that the BCCI controlled. This was followed by non-recognition of the league itself. Kapil Dev, who was the chairman of the National Cricket Academy and was also associated with the league, was sacked from his post. This was further exacerbated by banning all the players who participated in the league.

The board did not feel satisfied with this. They resorted to banning any foreign player who associated himself with the ICL. The arm-twisted the ICC into issuing a decree that the league would not be recognised unless and until the BCCI recognised it.  This was issued by none other than Malcolm Speed, the then chairman of the ICC. The BCCI had lots of power that even the ICC was and is afraid of the board. The extent to which BCCI went to scuttle the initiative was mindboggling.

BCCI and its restrictions

It is a known fact that the Indian board ( I do not have much respect for a self-centred body )has lot of restrictions on the commentators. They are not allowed to comment about the team selection, administration, criticise players to name just a few. This is outrageous. No wonder all the Indian commentators are lame and they do not have much to talk about. They repeat the same thing every now. They are treated as the lackeys of the board. Ravi Shastri’s comments are legendary. Basically, he has become the laughing stock of the commentating world.

Once a commentator is contracted by the production company, he must be free to express himself and not be restricted by some stupid board. If the commentator is not doing justice to his job, he is actually betraying the public. He is withholding information from the public who are depended on the experts to understand the match happenings.

 The great commentator Ian Chappell once refused to commentate in one of the India vs Australia series because he did not want to be restricted in his views. He is someone who stands by his principal. I have listened to Nasser, Atherton, David, Warne, Holding and I felt absolutely privileged. They are all so clear and if they felt something is not correct they said so. It is the beauty of commentary. Especially, all of them are former players who has much more insight into the game than the average cricket fan.

Wrapping up Lyon about CA and BCCI

Indian supporters are longing for the day when the board will be criticised severely for all the bad things that they constantly do.

The see ball hit ball game

The 8th game of the IPL at Hyderabad between Mumbai Indians and Sunrisers Hyderabad became the see ball hit ball game. Sunrisers ended up by eclipsing the record of RCB by posting the highest total in the history of IPL. Mumbai threatened to overtake that score but fell short by 31 runs. When you consider that the opposition scored 277, falling short by 31 runs and that too in a T20 game, is not at all poor. The fact of the matter is that the game wasn’t worth watching for the traditionalists of the game. Ofcourse, youngsters would have liked the game but is this really what we want to watch? Already, every rule in the game is in favour of batsmen.

Far too many rules favouring batsmen

Ball pitching outside of the leg-stump, even if goes onto hit the middle stump is still not out. Most of the grounds in the world are too small and the outfield is lightning quick. Every pitch in white-ball cricket is flat making it difficult for the bowlers to restrict. The line that marks wide delivery is way too close to the stump that the bowler, especially a spinner, margin of error is virtually zero. Only 2 bouncers per over diminishes the potency of the fast bowlers. The administrators are not at all thinking about the balance between the bat and the ball which is ridiculous. Against such a background, the Hyderabad pitch was a joke. Usually, it is the Bangalore pitch that is a nightmare for the bowlers but this Hyderabad one takes the cake.

T20 is a format that is loaded heavily in favour of the batsmen. The bowlers are restricted to just 4 overs per bowler whereas, a calculating batsman can even bat all 120 deliveries. There is not a semblance of fairness. In the knowledge that 10 wickets remain and only 20 overs to be negotiated and with the pitches being so batting friendly, it is easier for every batsman to just plonk his foot forward and hoick the ball into the stands which is anyway not that far away.

5 times

This is the number of times any team has scored 200 or more in the IPL so far. We are only in the 8th game. This number could reach 40 by the time the tournament terminates towards the end of May. What do the bowlers do under such circumstances? They are helpless. Consider for example, Maphaka, the 17-year old bowler from South Africa. He is a serious talent who could turnout for South Africa in the next 2-3 years. His confidence must have been dented after the initiation into T20 cricket. Even the bonafide Test great, Pat Cummins, wasn’t that economical either.

The administrators seem to have the wrong opinion that entertainment and enjoyment come with batsmen belting the ball to all parts of the ground. A good game is one where the bowlers too feel that they are in the game all the time. The last Test series between India and England is a case in point. The pitches favoured the spinners but not to an extent that even ordinary spinners could become dangerous. Only the good ones were able to pick up wickets if they were consistent enough. There was a game during the World T20 in 2021 in Australia at Perth between India and South Africa that was brilliant because of the bounce on offer. The target was just above 130 but it was tough chasing. These are the sort of games that keeps interest in the proceeding.

Wrapping up the see ball hit ball game

Cricket will eventually suffer is such games happen all the time. I agree that T20 is the format that now runs the game. Youngsters do not have the temperament to sit through 5 days of cricket, leave alone the ODI. The attention span has come down significantly and so is the tendency to not follow the game. However, a bit of assistance to the bowlers, be it fast bowlers or spinners, will only add value to the game.

Brand new edition of IPL

One more edition of the IPL will be underway in Chennai on the night of 22nd March 2024. This is the 17th edition of the tournament that has sprouted a lot of rival leagues throughout the cricketing world. The BBL in Australia was followed by Sri Lanka, Pakistan and West Indies with the latest entrants being South Africa, UAE & surprise of all surprises, USA. Nonetheless, IPL still remains the league that players the worldover wants to be part of. The reason is not difficult to fathom. It is the exorbitant money that is being paid to every player. Mitchell Starc and Pat Cummins have created a record of sorts by selling beyond 20 Cr Indian Rupee. An enormous amount by Indian standards.

The 17th edition will start with the winner of last year, CSK against RCB. It went against tradition in the sense that usually, it is the previous year’s finalists who would usually start the subsequent edition. For some reason, RCB has replaced last year’s finalist, Gujarat Titans. This year’s tournament has started with a mega surprise. After being at the helm for 14 years, save for a few games, Dhoni has stepped down as the captain of CSK. This was wholly unexpected. After winning the title over 2 of the last 3 years, fans of CSK expected Dhoni to continue to lead the squad. Ofcourse, it is inevitable that Dhoni will leave at some stage but no one expected it to happen just a day before the start of the competition.

Mumbai Indians

Mumbai Indians too sprang a surprise though not at the last minute as CSK. The franchise out of the blue, paid a hefty amount to Gujarat Titans for Hardik Pandya. At first, everyone would have thought that this was done merely to ensure that the franchise had sufficient muscle power during the lower end of the innings now that Kieran Pollard has retired. Pandya played for Mumbai for a very longtime when they decided not to retain him.

Pandya would have felt letdown which led to him becoming the captain of Gujarat Titans. The shock came a little later when Pandya replaced Rohit as the captain. That was when it dawned on everyone the real reason for hiring Pandya. There were lot of disgruntled players within the Mumbai Indians setup. Jasprit Bumrah and Surya Yadav Tweeted cryptic posts thereby signalling their intentions. However, I felt that this was waiting to happen.

Change in captaincy, waiting to happen

Rohit has been the captain for more than 8 years. Being the captain of any sporting side for that long, will dent a captain’s capability. He or she would have gone past their sell-by-date and it is time to look to the future. That is exactly what the franchise owner did. This is a professional sport. This is how things are. There is no need for his supporters to feel disheartened.

Afterall, much the same could be said for him when he took over the captaincy of the Indian Test squad from Kohli when Kohli very much wanted to continue. Changes in captaincy and changes in personnel will keep on happening in professional sports. Yes, Rohit did win 5 trophies but that was in the past. Rohit is 37 looking towards the end of his career but IPL will go on. Hence, MI is justified in planning for the future.

Sunrisers Hyderabad and Kolkatta Knightriders

Two franchises that plumped in enormous amount on just 2 players. Mitchell Starc and Pat Cummins were stunned by their bids. Never in their wildest dreams would they have expected to be sold for more than 20Cr. This was unprecedented in the annals of the IPL. Both of them will be under tremendous to justify the pricetag. More so, Cummins who is not a great success as a T20 cricketer. Remember, when he played for KKR previously, he was dropped frequently not because of the 4 foreign players restriction but because he did not have any impact at all.

Nonetheless, now that he is back with a huge sum, it was only expected that he will be named as the captain of SRH. Especially, after the success at The Ashes, the WTC final and the ODI World Cup, it would have been insane on the part of the franchise not to name him the captain.

Royal Challengers Bangalore and Gujarat Titans

Gujarat by virtue of having been traded Pandya for a huge sum, has appointed Shubman Gill, their standout batsmen in 2023 as the captain. This is a big risk because Gill has not captained any sie previously. Gujarat has in their ranks Rashid Khan who is an international captain. Without the calming influence of Hardik Pandya, does Gujarat Titans have the necessary gumption to reach the finals remains to be seen.

As for RCB, it has been a wait for 16 years. It really is a shock that despite the presence of several power hitters, this franchise has never won the title. This season, they have bolstered their squad with Cameroon Green to complement the hitting ability of Maxwell and Karthik.

Rest of the franchises

Delhi and Punjab, just like RCB are still waiting for their moment in the Sun. Ricky Ponting has been the coach of Delhi for the last few years but even he is unable to catapult them to winning the title. As for Rajasthan, ever since the Shane Warne inspired first title, they are nowhere near the podium for all these years. Lucknow Super Giants have been quite consistent since they started about a couple of years ago. Much depends on Rahul. If he continues with the Test match approach, Lucknow will have a tough time.

Wrapping up brand new edition of IPL

I am not going to predict but for me, it will be RCB, KKR, MI and SRH in the final 4. Let’s wait and watch how the tournament transpires.

Other IPL blogs

https://icricketcritique.com/ipl-must-prove-its-worth/
https://icricketcritique.com/midseason-review-of-the-ipl-2023/
https://icricketcritique.com/the-expansion-of-ipl/

Chennai Super Kings IPL Preview

The most successful team in the history of IPL alongwith Mumbai Indians, starts their campaign against RCB on the 22nd. Two titles in three years is a massive achievement. They will be hoping to ascend heights that no team has ever done before. One more title win will put them ahead of Mumbai Indians in the pecking order. Much was speculated about Dhoni that he would be retiring from all forms of the game. It reached a crescendo when the captaincy was handed over to Jadeja. However, Jadeja found the burden to tough and handed it right back to Dhoni. This happened a couple of seasons ago and since then, Dhoni has been in the saddle firmly. Social media is full of memes of Dhoni accepting the trophy at the ripe old age of 60. Chennai Super Kings IPL Preview.

Dhoni’s popularity has not dipped a wee bit. The innumerable number of travelling fans of CSK provides an edge to CSK wherever they play. The fans are the 12th man in the squad. The manic following unsettles the opponents. Everyone of the fans is a Dhoni supporter. Dhoni is an integral part of CSK just as Kohli is for RCB. He has been the captain right from the inception of IPL barring a few games when Jadeja took over.

Loyalty to the franchise

CSK is the most consistent side in the entire history of the IPL. Apart from the 5 titles, they have also reached the final 5 times which is 10 final appearances in 14 years. Remember the franchise was banned for a couple of years. Ofcourse, to win that many titles, Dhoni alone cannot be credited. The franchise has maintained a consistency that is hard to match. More often than not, they placed their faith in experienced players. Rahane, who was a forgotten man, found a new lease of life after turning up in the CSK colours. The loyalty of the players and the support staff is unmatched. Even the coach, Stephen Fleming is unchanged in 16 years.

A couple of New Zealanders

The inclusion of Rachin Ravindra and Daryl Mitchell will make the franchise stronger. We have seen the capabilities of both those players in the World Cup. Mitchell is capable of power hitting that matches the best in the business whereas Rachin can not only caress the ball in the gaps but can bowl a few useful overs. Their addition will be advantageous for the franchise. It remains to be seen whether both of them can play given the limit on foreign players. A year after winning their 5th title, CSK looks much more stronger. It can only be bad news for RCB who comes up against them first up.

Availability of the players

Devon Conway, the regular opener for CSK and an excellent striker of the ball, will be missing from action because of an injury. Pathirana, the Sri Lankan too will be missing because of a hamstring injury. With Rachin in the squad, he will easily slot in in the place of Conway. CSK’s bowling has not always been their strong forte. It is something they have learned to circumvent. Shardul Thakur’s return will induce depth to the batting. He is in good form with the bat having helped Mumbai win against Tamil Nadu in the Ranji Trophy.

With Deepak Chahar in the playing eleven too, the batting depth will be the envy of every other team. Chahar himself is no mug with the bat. He can bat like a proper allrounder.

The franchise will aim to win all their games in Chennai through the spin combination of Santner, Jadeja and Moeen Ali. Last year, they lost 3 though that didn’t prevent them from winning the title but it is something they would like to avoid.

Probable playing eleven for the initial games

Rachin Ravindra, Ruturaj Gaikwad, Ajinkya Rahane, Sameer Rizvi, Daryl Mitchell, Shivam Dube, Ravindra Jadeja, MS Dhoni (c), Shardul Thakur, Deepak Chahar, Maheesh Theekshana

Wrapping up Chennai Super Kings IPL Preview

It is hard to predict where CSK will end. They are known for surprises. 3 years ago, they were outplayed in most of the games but 3 years later, they have won 2 titles. Reaching the playoff should be achievable. Proceeding further depends on the form of the squad.

Other blogs about CSK

https://icricketcritique.com/the-ipl-2021-finals-and-chennai-super-kings/
https://icricketcritique.com/review-chennai-super-kings/
https://icricketcritique.com/the-dream-partnership-of-g-g/
https://icricketcritique.com/the-ridiculous-timing-of-ipl/
https://icricketcritique.com/csk-ipl-2023-analysis/

Royal Challengers Bangalore IPL Preview

The Royal Challengers Bangalore will be under all sorts of pressure this season because of the success of their counterparts in the just concluded WPL. It has been 16 years since the inception of the IPL but RCB have never won the title even once though they reached the final on three occasions. This is the biggest mystery of the IPL because of the presence of powerful hitters in the ranks of RCB. Chris Gayle, Virat Kohli, AB de Villiers alongwith Maxwell and du Plessis over the last couple of years. Yet, RCB never tasted success. Now, with the triumph of the women, the men will be under greater pressure. It may lead to enhanced performance or it may drag them down even further. Only time will tell. Royal Challengers Bangalore IPL Preview.

After a run of 3 successive playoff appearances, RCB were relegated in the group stage last year when they ran into a Shubman Gill blitzkrieg at the Chinnaswamy Stadium. A run of seven wins and seven losses wasn’t that great to warrant a place in the finals. Yet, hope persisted among the RCB fans that was finally extinguished by that assault by Gill.

Personnel changes

RCB have ringed changes both within the squad and among the support staff. Andy Flower, the controversial former England coach, will be the head coach whereas Mo Bobat has taken over as the Director of Cricket. Andy Flower as we all know is a no-nonsense coach. As a side note, Kevin Pietersen never liked him as a coach and he was always at loggerheads with him. Nevertheless, he will probably be the same rigid and tough coach with his new franchise as well. How the most experienced players like Kohli, Maxwell and Du Plessis will take to him, remains to be seen.

Among the players, the key additions are Cameroon Green, Alzarri Joseph and Lockie Ferguson. For some reason, RCB did not think it fit to retain Hazaranga who was quite successful in the game he played. Now, they are left with pace bowlers and the lack of genuine spin bowlers might come back to bite them. Perhaps, they chose these bowlers keeping in mind the games in Bangalore where the pitch is an absolute nightmare for any bowler, especially spinners. It is time the curator at Bangalore prepares a pitch that will help the RCB’s faster bowlers rather than being a pure delight for the batsmen.

Players to watch out for

Again the same suspects. Virat Kohli, du Plessis and Glenn Maxwell. However, the greenhorse could be Cameroon Green. He is coming off of a successful series in New Zealand where he got his highest Test score so far. He could also bowl 4 overs which means that the allrounder or even the spot of a specialist bowler, could be filled by him. Green didn’t perform that well for Mumbai Indians last year but he has got a bit more experience than the last outing. Faf and Maxwell are certain to feature in all the games which leaves just 2 spots for foreign players. Will Green be the 3rd one?

As for Kohli, now that the women have opened the RCB account, he will be raring to make a double with the men. He has had a wonderful break of about 2 months and must be completely rejuvenated. His combination at the top with Faf will be rollicking. However, once the powerplay is over, they slow down considerably. With the inclusion of Green and the return of Rajat Patidar, RCB will have to aim for 20 runs more than the par score in every game. It will also give their underrated bowlers a chance to defend.

Maxwell is a blow-hot, blow-cold type of player. If it is his day, he can make a mincemeat of any attack. On other days, even an ordinary attack will be a handful for him. How is Faf going to adjust after becoming a T20 specialist will be keenly seen.

Availability of players

Everyone is available throughout the tournament. There was a slight doubt regarding Green’s availability for the initial few games but Cricket Australia approved for him to travel to India without playing in the Sheffield Shield final.

Probable playing eleven, atleast for the initial games

Faf, Kohli, Patidar, Maxwell, Green, Lomror, Karthik, Topley, Siraj, Akash and any spinner.

Kohli’s slot

Kohli was successful as an opener in the last edition. It makes sense for him to continue in that position. Ofcourse there isn’t any specialist opener in the squad. So Kohli will continue. There is a suggestion of making Green open the innings. He has done that for Australia in white-ball cricket. It will allow Kohli to move down to his favourite spot but I think Andy Flower must resist that idea. Kohli is better suited at the top of the order.

Wrapping up Royal Challengers Bangalore IPL Preview


RCB’s fans have had enough. They have been let down repeatedly over the last 16 years. Now that the fans have seen the women succeed, they will be hoping that this year turns out to be good for the men too. If not for anyone, RCB’s players owe their fans one title after all these years.

Other RCB blogs

https://icricketcritique.com/rcbs-huge-virat-kohli-problem/
https://icricketcritique.com/rcbs-costly-purchase-and-other-series/
https://icricketcritique.com/review-of-royal-challengers-bangalore-in-ipl-2022/
https://icricketcritique.com/rcb-the-eternal-bridesmaid/
https://icricketcritique.com/rcb-and-their-nemesis-csk/
https://icricketcritique.com/kohli-livid-at-rcbs-yet-another-loss/
https://icricketcritique.com/rcb-ipl-2023-review/

Increased pay for the Indians

I am here again, to laud BCCI for a wonderful initiative. After the diktat of representing their respective state teams to those players who are not part of the Indian team but are in their state teams, the board has come up with one more laudable decision. Awarding players who prefer Test cricket and thereby helping to not only safeguard the traditional format but also prompt a change of heart in those players who feel that they can still play Test cricket and earn a luxurious living. With a couple of excellent initiatives, BCCI has done something to the players who are depended on this game for their livelihood.

The lifespan of anyone in sports, is short. For the exceptionally good, it could be 13-15 years whereas for the good players, it could be between 10-13 years. Everyone else, will fall in the 5-year category. It makes their careers extremely short. Once they are out of the sport, they will hardly know how to lead their lives. The pitiable state of India’s first bowler who bowled the first delivery in the Ranji Trophy, Shri. M.J. Gopalan, comes to mind. He lived in a home that had only one room. Ofcourse, the cricketers of this century are earning a lot more and they do have some plans for the future but it does not mean their lives are mapped completely.

If a cricketer or anyone in sports wants to make the most out of their playing career, it makes perfect sense. He or she will have to secure themselves financially. For every Kohli earning in millions, there is always an Ashok Dinda who has already retired without much financial security. Those cricketers who are earning in millions in the IPL or other lucrative leagues are blessed. Equally, others aren’t that lucky.

The measures of the BCCI

Toward that end, what the BCCI has come up with is not only laudable but soothing too. I hope that this is only a start and that there are more to come.

The BCCI has announced “Test Cricket Incentive Scheme”. It proposes to increase the match-fee of any player by 300% if he plays in more than 75% of the Tests played in a calendar year.

“This scheme is not only designed to encourage players to engage in the purest format of the sport but also addresses the evolving dynamics of the cricketing landscape, ensuring parity with match fees in other formats and league cricket,” the BCCI said in a statement, with president Roger Binny saying, “This initiative aligns with our vision of promoting Test cricket as the pinnacle of the sport.”

Pujara and Rahane

The heartwarming feature of this scheme is that it will be applied retrospectively from 2022-2023. It actually means that Pujara who was considered only for Test cricket and Rahane will also benefit from the largesse of the board. Pujara will earn 45 Lakhs more per Test that he featured in. Pujara and Rahane are not in the scheme of things any longer. Both of them have played their final Test already. With the arrival of Devdutt Padikkal, Jaiswal, Shubman Gill, Sarfaraz Khan, Jurel and a host of youngsters waiting in the wings, it will be safe to assume that both Pujara and Rahane will not find their way back into the Test team.


However, to honour their services, this is a good decision. Rahane will be remembered forever for the series win in Australia win all seemed lost. Pujara too will be remembered for his exploits in Australia that resulted in twin series victories consecutively. The famous words of Josh Hazlewood, will linger in the air until the game remains. He said that he was sick of the sight of Pujara on the wicket. Pujara and Rahane will feel elated that they have not been forgotten nor are their contribution to the team. This one move by the BCCI, has had me flabbergasted. Great work BCCI.

Thanks to Shreyas and Ishan

This change would not have occurred if Shreyas and Ishan Kishan hadn’t refused to follow the diktat of the BCCI and play for their state teams. Their insubordination has rightly terminated their contracts for the year and has also made the BCCI think about the players choosing and dictating to the board. Would they have learned a lesson because of their arrogance? Would they repeat the same? Only time will tell. For the moment, let us applaud the board for being firm and making the right decision.

Fast bowlers contract

Another good move was to award fast bowling contracts to 5 bowlers who are promising. Now, these bowlers can concentrate on their craft and become a better bowler and play for the nation for a very longtime. This must free them from financial worries and

Push by other boards

This may have prompted other boards. The English and Australian boards have planned to approach the ICC to set a benchmark for minimum payments for Test cricket to 20K AUD per game. Countries like the West Indies pay their players just 5000AUD per game which is by far the lowest among the Test playing nations. I dont know whether every board will be able to afford a fee of 20K. Most of the boards do not earn as high as India or England or Australia. They are finding it difficult to make ends meet. This slab of 20K may not be possible but there will be a compromise formula as a result of which the players of less richer boards will also be able to earn decently.

Wrapping up increased pay for the Indians

I am a harsh critique of the Board of Control for Cricket in India. However, in this instance, I can only admire the intention of trying to make the Ranji Trophy relevant.

Other blogs about the board

https://icricketcritique.com/roger-binny-the-new-bcci-president/
https://icricketcritique.com/one-more-warning-for-the-administrators/
https://icricketcritique.com/removal-of-the-entire-indian-selection-panel/
https://icricketcritique.com/the-role-of-a-cricket-captain/
https://icricketcritique.com/rohit-dravid-the-team-and-the-board/
https://icricketcritique.com/the-curious-case-of-sarfaraz-khan/
https://icricketcritique.com/the-importance-of-the-ranji-trophy/

England’s series against India

Before proceeding to read this blog, please read part one of the England series against India. In this blog, I will dissect the opinion of England’s former cricketers, some of whom were really savage on their team. It was an incredible performance on the part of the Indians who missed several key personnel in the lead upto the series and also during the series. England’s were thoroughly walloped in the series. A couple of those defeats were quite heavy. There is no escaping that fact. The former England players laid the blame squarely upon Bazball. I definitely feel that this is unfair. Bazball is just a methodology that needs to be properly executed. The England batsmen executed rather poorly. That is a fact.

Needless chatter

The claims from Anderson, Duckett and a few others were grand. Those were needless and immature. Ben Duckett said the more, the better at Rajkot when England were facing a chase of over 550 runs and were bundled for 122. Duckett could be excused for being immature but what about Anderson? The senior pro? He said that even if India were to post a target of 600 runs, England would chase them in 60-70 overs. This was arrogance. He could have said that whatever the score is, we will chase and win. That would have been a normal statement. Perhaps, the win at Hyderabad made the entire team cocky.

It is one thing to believe within themselves that they can win from any position but it is completely different to utter such nonsense statement to the press when playing away from the home. It certainly got the Indians riled up. Ashwin felt that England had gone too far. It must be noted that the effect of Bazball made Rohit and Dravid cautious. They needed that cushion of 100 runs when usually, teams will declare with a lead of about 450.

Comments made by former players

Alastair Cook wrote, “[Bazball] is not a one-size-fits-all approach. The recent results speak for themselves: it is not a winning formula. It seems there is a lack of responsibility and a lack of accountability … winning does matter, winning is paramount. Losing is not just a shrug of the shoulders.”

Jonathan Agnew lamented,

“It is frustrating, but that’s where you have to be accountable. If not, the fans will start to see through that.”

Adam Gilchrist mocked,“They’re not going to lose this Test now that the captain Ben Stokes has come out and said ‘we want to win this week. Which is a real change in philosophy from say the start of the Ashes where winning was not on the agenda, it was not even on the radar. It was all about entertainment.”

Michael Vaughan ridiculed, “England losing by 434 clearly in this series is not a hammering, it’s just quite a close game that was taking place. What I like about Stokesy, at least this week he was telling the world he was going to win. He decided this was the week, the last few Test matches was just to give India some confidence. You have to remember that Bazball is all about saving Test cricket and giving the public what they want and that’s exactly what Ben and his team have done over the past few weeks.”

My take

Some of these were quite savage. All of them have been blamed directly or indirectly, Bazball though Vaughan points out the penchant of Stokes to entertain. Stokes when he took over the captaincy, famously said that England are here to entertain the public. It certainly sounded like they cared about entertainment rather than winning. This was in evidence because of 2 nonsensical decisions, one against Australia and the other against New Zealand. Ben Stokes declared the innings in the first Test when England were not in that comfortable position. They went onto lose that Test.

The bottomline is, Stokes, McCullum and the England players must understand that winning a Test is tough, extremely tough. They are not playing the game to entertain but to win. Entertainment is not the job of any sports personality. It is the profile of theatre artists. Sports is to win.

Wrapping up England’s series against India

Blaming Bazball I do not think is the solution. England has been doing well under this new method. Winning in India is tough but England could have done better with India missing out on experienced players.

The series from England’s perspective

The English were overwhelming in their opinion about the series in India. They will lose and some even said heavily. In the end, it did come true. England lost the series heavily. 1-4 defeat, with the sole victory on the back of an unbelievable Ollie Pope innings, that they must have lost as well. The critics and former players roasted England and blamed their newfound mantra of Bazball for the defeat. In particular, Michael Vaughan and Adam Gilchrist, though being an Australian, he love whenever England loses. There were several reasons for England’s loss but Bazball is not among them. If at all Bazball needs to be criticised, it could only be for the execution and not the intention itself. The series from England’s perspective.

Was the series so bad from England’s perspective that critics are all-over them? In one of the Test, the display was abysmal, to say the least, and in the final Test, with the series gone, their minds were in England. It happens to every touring side that is on the losing side. You invariably tend to shift your mind onto the comfort of home, the family and everything that is connected with the homeland.

Inexperienced spinners were a major issue

England came to India armed with 3 spinners who had hardly played 5 games among them. Two of them, Shoaib Bashir and Tom Hartley, made their debut in this series. The 3rd one, Rehan Ahmed, has only appeared in 4 Tests, 2 of which were in this series. Perhaps, if the pitches were like the ones when they last played here, the inexperience of these spinners may not have mattered because on such pitches, even the utter mediocre spinner, becomes a wicket-taker. Credit to the Indian curators, the pitches were much more friendly towards the batsmen. It meant that these spinners were inadequate for the task on hand.

Indian batsmen, though not the current ones, are generally known as renowned players of spin. It is not the case any longer but on a good batting pitch, these Indian batsmen will come into their shelf and for such a set of batsmen, these inexperienced spinners were no match. It showed in match after match. Out of nowhere, Tom Hartley produced a spell that gave England an unexpected victory at Hyderabad but otherwise, with the pitches turning a bit less, they were all exposed.

Added to their inexperience, the English spinners did not possess the necessary skills to thwart batsmen on good batting pitches with the exception of Bashir, just a little bit. Jack Leach’s absence was another blow because he was the only experienced bowler though it is debatable whether he would have changed the fortune of England. It is hard to believe that England does not possess a single quality spinner in their land. There are about 17 Counties with some of them being spin-friendly and yet, after Graeme Swann, they are unable to produce a quality spinner.

Lack of proper preparation

Bazball has done wonders for England. Before the start of the series, they won 11 of the 17 Tests which included a 3-0 sweep of Pakistan in Pakistan. An unprecedented event. Critics are quick to point out that the same Bazball proved to be inadequate during the bigger series against Australia and India. One was drawn while the other was lost. These are infact valid points but was Bazball the reason for such defeats? It was because the English batsmen were ill-equipped to handle the turning ball.

How many practice games did they play before the first Test? India too repeat the same mistake everytime they travel outside. England are no exception. The one reasoning is that the practice pitches are nowhere near the pitches that they will find in the Tests. Be that as it may, it still is essential to get oneself accustomed to the pitches of the host nation. Let the pitches resemble the actual Test match pitches otherwise, but there is no substitute for good old practice games before every series.

England themselves were able to win in Australia in 2011 because of such an approach. When they won in India in 2012, they followed the same process. Why was it different this time around? Was it overconfidence?

Agreed that they swept Pakistan and Sri Lanka without any first-class game but India is no pushover. In India, the team will fight to their fullest capability.

The poor execution of the batsmen

Zak Crawley showed how to apply the Bazball approach selectively. He played aggressively but he wasn’t reckless. It was a pity that he never once went past 100 despite 4 scores of over 50. The fault essentially lies on 3 batsmen. Joe Root, Johnny Bairstow and Ben Stokes. None of them scored when it mattered with the latter two being utter failures. Stokes played like a cricketer who has never seen spin before. He was completely crease-bound and played off the backfoot for balls that were pitched close enough. He was never confident in his ability with the bat. Stokes did not know whether to go back or come forward for any delivery. He was always caught on two minds and as a result, he did neither.

Also, his tendency to react as though an extraordinary delivery had got him, is a bit extreme. Bumrah’s delivery was exceptional and one of Kuldeep’s but the same reaction for every time he was bowled or LBW, is ridiculous.

As for Johnny Bairstow, one wonders whether he can even bat. I am being harsh here but how can someone who averages just above 36, could have played 100 Tests? It is strange that England does not have another batsman who could replace Bairstow. He was completely clueless in the entire series. Not even a single 50 in 10 innings is outrageous. Once England goes back, against the likes of West Indies and Sri Lanka, he may make merry but England must find a replacement for Bairstow before the Ashes next year.

Joe Root

Joe Root was roundly criticised for his ill-advised ramp shot of Bumrah when England were cruising after a Duckett blitzkrieg. He did not attempt the same shot again. A return of one 100 and one 50 in 10 innings was unacceptable. The 50 was inconsequential. He is a batsman who plays spin quite well and being the senior-most batsman, who has travelled to these parts multiple times, he must have placed a premium on his wicket. Instead, he did not apply himself well.

Wrapping up the series from England’s perspective

There will be one more I guess about Vaughan and Gilchrist comments and some more.

https://icricketcritique.com/the-pataudi-trophy/
https://icricketcritique.com/the-sweepstakes-that-india-missed/
https://icricketcritique.com/the-sweepstakes-that-india-missed-2/
https://icricketcritique.com/india-needs-improvement-despite-the-win/
https://icricketcritique.com/indian-teams-priorities-are-wrong
https://icricketcritique.com/perhaps-rohits-best-win/
https://icricketcritique.com/an-excellent-series-win/
https://icricketcritique.com/series-win-indian-perspective/
https://icricketcritique.com/contribution-of-the-bowlers/

Contribution of the bowlers

The contribution of the bowlers can be read here before proceeding with the contribution of the bowlers. The biggest plus for India was easily the bowling of Kuldeep Yadav. He is someone who despite talent, missed out on a lot of cricket. Some years ago, Ravi Shastri, the then Indian coach said that Kuldeep will be India’s number one spinner outside of India. This was right after he took 5-fer in Sydney. Something no Indian spinner has taken. From there to finding himself out of reckoning, that was a drastic fall for him. He belongs to the rare world of leftarm leg-spin bowling. More than 90% of the batsmen around the world, would not have faced such a bowling and as such, he is a threat to any of them.

For sometime, he was one half of the “Kulcha” combination that won many a ODIs for India. The famous being the annihilation of South Africa in South Africa. All of that was in the past. Now, if reports are to be believed, he has turned a new corner. His bowling much quicker in the air. It will not be an understatement to state that he was the difference between the two teams. You had Bumrah, Ashwin and Jadeja but Kuldeep’s timely strikes were the ones that paved the way for the rest to spin a web around the English batsmen.

How to remain in the team?

He was rightly adjudged Player of the Match at Dharmshala but for me atleast, he could well have been Player of the Series if not for the freakish form of Jaiswal. It also looks like he has worked on his batting. He understood that merely taking wickets would not be enough. He must be capable of holding one end which he did quite admirably. The partnerships that he had with Jurel and with Jaiswal were instrumental in breaking the back of the English bowlers. The challenge for Kuldeep is now to become a permanent member.

This is easier said than done. Ashwin and Jadeja are very much the top horses. It is safe to assume that he has now relegated Axar Patel to the 4th spinning option but with India opting for just one spinner outside of India, even Ashwin not finding a spot, how can Kuldeep fit into the scheme of things? Definitely, his batting is not on par with Jadeja though Jadeja’s batting nowadays seems to be block and block and block. Also, we do not know how his batting will hold up outside of India. For now atleast, Kuldeep will have to keep delivering and hope that once Ashwin retires, he can be in contention all the time or India decides to go in with 6 specialist batsmen and 4 spinners with a legspinner outside of India.

Ashwin and Jadeja

It must be said that the infusion of Kuldeep Yadav in the mixture helped Ashwin and Jadeja to their self. They were under pressure to pick up wickets which didn’t happen at Hyderabad. Especially against Ollie Pope, they did not have an answer. Once Kuldeep was in the team, picking up important wickets, both Ashwin and Jadeja imposed themselves upon the hapless English batsmen.

It must be said that Jadeja must understand that cricket is a game of runs and wickets. Understood, he scored a hundred that resulted in India winning the Test but his batting has become laborious. He seems to fill in for his state mate, Pujara. He plays far too many dot balls which is not his ilk. Multiple times during the series, he remained strokeless for a vast part of the game. It neither took the team nor himself anywhere. By playing so slowly, he not only puts a lot of pressure on himself but he actually transforms the pressure onto the rest of the team.

He must understand that being a specialist batsman at number 6, it is imperative that he score runs. There wasn’t much to write about his bowling because we all know what he is capable of in these conditions.

The fast bowlers

Jasprit Bumrah did what he does the best. The incredible spell of fast bowling at Ranchi was a delight to watch. I still have some reservations about his skipping of the 4th Test when the series was very much alive. For that matter, any game for the nation is alive. He, the BCCI and the team management must realise that for such a precious bowler, skipping IPL or part of the IPL is not wrong. Mumbai Indians must be told that the nation is far more important than their franchise.

As for Siraj, Mukesh and Akash Deep, they did their part though it must be said that Mukesh Kumar looks far too pedestrian when bowling on unfriendly pitches.

Wrapping up the contribution of the bowlers with the coach Rahul Dravid

This was the first significant win for Rahul Dravid as a coach. India won against Australia last year but we all know the state of the pitches. We also reached the finals of the ODI World Cup but winning it alone would have been considered significant. He lost a series in South Africa and drew another one when the expectation was India winning both the series. Now, he will have something on his CV to showcase. In a lovely gesture after the end of the series, he made it a point to thank the selectors led by Ajit Agarkar.

“I’d just like to give a big shoutout to Ajit [Agarkar, chairman of selectors] and his team as well,” Dravid said. “A lot of the youngsters that come in, honestly, as a coach and as a captain, we don’t actually get to see them because we don’t see as much domestic cricket as Ajit and his team of selectors do. And they’ve pushed us and they’ve challenged us to pick some of these young players and they’ve picked the right ones and they’ve come out here and performed. So sometimes it’s not easy being a selector because you always get the criticism but a big credit and a big pat on the back to Ajit and his team as well.”

This was a beautiful gesture. Seldom do the selectors get credit for their work. Here in this series, they have introduced quite a few debutants who have also equipped themselves well. Ofcourse they will have to perform away from home to be considered consistently.

https://icricketcritique.com/the-pataudi-trophy/
https://icricketcritique.com/the-sweepstakes-that-india-missed/
https://icricketcritique.com/the-sweepstakes-that-india-missed-2/
https://icricketcritique.com/india-needs-improvement-despite-the-win/
https://icricketcritique.com/indian-teams-priorities-are-wrong
https://icricketcritique.com/perhaps-rohits-best-win/
https://icricketcritique.com/an-excellent-series-win/
https://icricketcritique.com/series-win-indian-perspective/

Series win Indian perspective

Prior to the start of the series, if anyone had told Rohit Sharma that his team would lose one Test, he would have been satisfied. If the same person had told him that his team would win 4 Tests and thereby the series, he would have been ecstatic. With the withdrawal of Virat Kohli just before the series and the unavailability of Mohammed Shami, Rohit Sharma must have been cautiously optimistic. He knew that India was playing at home and that England did not possess excellent spinners. Yet, India had come unstuck against the thing that is called as Bazball at Headingley. Added to that, England won a series in Pakistan 3-0 playing the brand of cricket that was hitherto unseen in this part of the world. Series in Indian perspective.

If Shami’s unavailability was a loss, Kohli withdrawing himself was a body blow. It was further complicated by the injuries to Rahul and Jadeja and the need to rest Bumrah for atleast one game. The flipside to this is that a cream of youngsters emerged who may carry the torch for the foreseeable future. More of that later. Now, let me analyse the series from the Indian perspective.

The blossoming of youngsters, Jaiswal

The name that is likely to be among the minds of international teams will be that of Yashavi Jaiswal. He had a stellar series with a couple of hundreds including a double. The fact that he is lefthanded and that too, at the top of the order, is Godsent for the team. For a very longtime, India never had good left-hand batsmen either in the top or the middle order to disrupt the rhythm of the bowlers. As a result, the bowlers more or less need to settle into bowling one pattern. Now, the emergence of Jaiswal at the top has been refreshing. He showed in the series that he could play in all kinds of ways.

If the situation calls for quick runs, he can murder the bowling or if the situation calls for playing time, he could stay in the wicket and wait for bad balls to punish. It shows that he has a temperament that is an essential ingredient at the highest level. With runs in this series, albeit against inexperienced bowlers and a double hundred in the West Indies, Jaiswal seems to possess the necessary skills to excel at this level. By the way, he is also a good sweeper which an overwhelming number of Indian batsmen never play.

Ofcourse, a stern examination of his technique and skill awaits later this year in Australia. Against the likes of Cummins, Starc, Hazlewood and Lyon, if he could score a couple of hundreds, he would have passed the test. Ofcourse, next year, in England, he will be called upon to bat against the swinging ball. For now, atleast, he can bask in all the glory.

The blossoming of youngsters, Jurel

In the absence of Rishabh Pant, Indian keeping is in safe hands. Dhruv Jurel not only displayed efficiency behind the wickets but showed an ample amount of gumption in front of the wickets. The calm and composed manner of his innings at Ranchi ensured an Indian win after the mid-innings jitter. The first innings 90 was excellent in the same sense which helped the team to narrow the lead down to manageable proportion which at one time, threatened to be in excess of 150. He seems to have learnt the art of pacing an innings with the tail so early in his career. It is a skill that only a few possess. The sad part is that once Pant is back from his life-threatening injury, Jurel may not even find a spot in the playing eleven.

Will the management be interested to retain him as a specialist batsmen?

The blossoming of youngsters, Akash Deep

He was picked from obscurity. Akash Deep was unheard of until he made his debut. Credit must be given to the team management to have given Akash a chance in the absence of Bumrah. Previous management teams have tended to take the safer route and pick the experienced bowler, albeit at the first class level. Here Dravid and Rohit showed some pluck and went in with the better pace of Akash than Mukesh Kumar. He made a solid start with 3 wickets in the innings paving the way for the rest of the bowlers to follow.

The blossoming of youngsters, Sarfaraz Khan

Sarfaraz literally broke the door down to enter the Indian team. He has scored a gigantic volume of runs for Mumbai over the last 2-3 years. Everytime a team is announced, he demanded selection. The absence of Kohli, Rahul and Jadeja meant an opportunity for Sarfaraz finally. He did not disappoint. Infact, a century on debut was his for the taking if not for some stupid Jadeja call. Nevertheless, the pace at which he scored his runs and the effortlessness of his sweeps means that he will have a long career. Just like Jaiswal, Jurel and Akash, his examination will come later this year although, once Kohli and Rahul are back, he is unlikely to find a spot in the playing eleven.

The return of Rohit and Shubman

Shubman has enormous talent. It is clear for everyone. His lack of consistency across formats is highly frustrating. Without talent, no one will be able to score 90 while chasing at The Gabba and thereby being instrumental in winning the series. Moreover, he did not seem to learn from his mistakes. Far too often, he gave his wicket away for middling scores. His talent called for more. A couple of hundreds in this series and a 90 are good but this must be par for course. Having said that, with Gill, you never know. He may again slip back into the scoreless streak that keeps extending without a break. He needs to score more and more heavily for him to be considered as even close to Kohli.

Rohit showed that the light was burning bright during the twilight of his career.

Wrapping up series win Indian perspective

I intend to write part 2 of the series win. In this blog, I have concentrated only on the batsmen. Next, it will be about the bowlers and the coach Rahul Dravid.

Related blogs

https://icricketcritique.com/the-pataudi-trophy/
https://icricketcritique.com/the-sweepstakes-that-india-missed/
https://icricketcritique.com/the-sweepstakes-that-india-missed-2/
https://icricketcritique.com/india-needs-improvement-despite-the-win/
https://icricketcritique.com/indian-teams-priorities-are-wrong
https://icricketcritique.com/perhaps-rohits-best-win/
https://icricketcritique.com/an-excellent-series-win/