The BCCI and the selectors have blundered by not making Ashwin the captain. Once Kohli relinquished his position, Rohit by default became the captain. I for one, would have made Ashwin the captain. Critics will argue that he wasn’t a regular in SENA nations and hence, he cannot be made the captain. It will say that that is hogwash. Agreed that Ashwin did not have a great record outside of Asia and West Indies during the initial years. His figures were lopsided.
The perfectionist that he was, in an effort to achieve perfection, he kept on making technical adjustments throughout his career. The statistics bear out that he was able to accomplish and achieve brilliance between 2015 and 2021. He averaged 27 in England and 27.50 in Australia. The anomalies were South Africa and New Zealand but the sample size is too low. Two Tests in South Africa and just one in New Zealand. Hardly enough number of games to judge anybody, leave alone Ashwin.
Ashwin’s thinking and the captain India missed
One of his decision that showcased the ever-thinking mind was during a game between Tamil Nadu and Gujarat. During the game, Ashwin placed unconventional and unorthodox fields which drew attention. He had a fielder in a straight line to that of the umpire. Years later, MS Dhoni adopted this strategy to contain a certain Kieran Pollard’s big hitting. In due course of time, everyone adopted it to contain Pollard. One can only wonder what heights could India have reached if only Ashwin had become the captain.
The point is that him not being a regular is just balderdash. Australia never made Shane Warne, the best brain in that Australian team, the captain but the reasons were completely different. I will say that that was a huge blunder. BCCI made the same mistake with Ashwin. Leave alone making him the captain, they did not even make him the captain of the 2nd string team that went to Sri Lanka and played other games when the main team were in England. Dinesh Karthik, wanted Ashwin to be the captain of the team that went to the Asian Games. That did not happen either. BCCI did a great disservice to Ashwin in this regard.
The constantly churning mind
Ashwin keeps thinking about the game all the time. In his younger days, when he could not play the game on the streets, he wanted to be involved even if that meant scoring. The game and Ashwin are made for each other. Critics, including me, have often pointed out that he experiments a lot with his bowling. The straighter runup, the angled runup, legspin, carrom ball and so many others. He was even told that there was a risk of him losing his stock delivery if he continued with his experiments. However, Ashwin wasn’t afraid to experiment with his methods in the middle of a Test. It never deterred in him landing the ball where he wanted to.
That he has been India’s greatest match winner can clearly be seen in statistic. 11 Test Player-of-the-Series awards, the joint-highest in world cricket, and 10 match awards, the third-highest for an Indian and joint-highest for an Indian bowler.
Sundar was not the reason
It is now slowly emerging that this wasn’t a rash decision. It wasn’t a decision taken because he was unhappy over something. Anirudh Srikkanth, with whom Ashwin has played quite a lot of cricket during their formative years, revealed on his show “Cheeky Cheeka” that Ashwin told him that he may retire even before going to Australia. As Rohit Sharma said, he was made to wait till Perth before announcing his decision. There is a section of the media that has involved in conspiracy theory that the selection of Sundar ahead of him at Perth irked him. I do not think that this is true. Ashwin is not a vindictive person. On the contrary, he encourages fellow spinners and if it is Sundar, he will be much more pleased than Ashwin himself.
Batting ability
The real reason Ashwin wasn’t part of the team whenever India played abroad is not because of his bowling but it was because of his batting. It is now an open secret that Ashwin started his career as an opening batsman. How many of us know that it was his mother, through a casual remark, made him think of bowling offspin? The Ashwin in full flow, is a treat to watch. He has the silken grace of a left-hander and art of placing the ball in the gaps. The only thing that he lacked was brute power. He just cannot bludgeon the ball to all corners of the ground.
Otherwise, his batting was technically solid. He averaged a healthy 33 during the initial part of his career. As he concentrated more on becoming a better bowler in all conditions, he neglected his batting ability. As a result, a healthy average went down to 25 before creeping back to 27 when he retired.
His declining numbers with the bat, coincided with the better batting ability of Jadeja. India preferred four seamers and one spinner and that spinner must be capable of contributing runs. This was where Ashwin missed out. If only he could have focussed on his batting and maintained the average in the 30s, whilst improving his bowling, it would have been impossble to drop him from the team.
Wrapping up Ravichandran Ashwin retires two
The timing may not have been perfect but the final outing was still eventful. On an Adelaide track that favoured the seamers greatly, where Nathan Lyon bowled just one over, Ashwin on the otherhand, bowled when Australia were dominating the game. He alongwith Bumrah were the only bowlers to average under 3 in that innings. He got the wicket of Mitchell Marsh and almost got Travis Head but it fell short. The guile, the skill and the drift were all on display one last time.
Post retirement, joining the commentary team will probably be a good fit for him. It is so boring to listen to the likes of Bhogle, Shastri and Gavaskar for more than 3 decades. It will be refreshing to hear Ashwin speak. A few years down the line, if he is willing, he will make a great coach of the Indian team. His vastly popular YouTube channel, with more 1.6 million subscribers, is already a huge hit with the public. Perhaps, he will have a lot of “Kutti Stories”.
The best tribute for Ashwin came from MSK Prasad who felt the player deserved a better farewell. “While retirement decisions are personal, a legendary farewell would certainly have been a fitting tribute to his illustrious career. It would not only celebrate his achievements but also allow fans, teammates, and the cricketing fraternity to express their gratitude for his immense contribution. His legacy as one of India’s greatest cricketers is forever etched in history,” the former chief selector of India said.
Other Ashwin blogs
https://icricketcritique.com/ashwin-and-the-opening/
https://icricketcritique.com/it-was-all-on-the-streets/
https://icricketcritique.com/the-heartbreak-and-the-elation/
https://icricketcritique.com/ashwin-and-his-early-games/
https://icricketcritique.com/the-ashwin-autobiography-continuation/
https://icricketcritique.com/the-ashwin-autobiography-final-chapter
https://icricketcritique.com/ravichandran-ashwin-retires-one/