Some strange things are happening in the IPL 2022. Rajasthan Royals were at it again. It was another strange move in the IPL. Ashwin was sent in at number 3. Just read it again. Ashwin at number 3. It was such a strange decision that anyone who had watched the game in the 90s were taken back to that era.

Back then, it was a common sight to see a bowler walk in at the fall of the first wicket. It was an era when bouncers were banned from the game. Only one was allowed in Test cricket and none in ODIs. Knowing fully well that the bouncers will not be forthcoming, every team more or less had one bowler who had power-hitting capabilities. A quick 30-40 in as less balls as possible was what expected of those hitters. The intention was to take advantage of the field restrictions in the first 15 overs. They were all collectively called Pinch Hitters. Some of them were quite successful in that role. Pat Symcox & Azhar Mahmood comes to mind immediately. This was shelved in a few years once bouncers came back into limited overs cricket.

Hopefully, the concept will be revived

Now Rajasthan has reinvented or rather given a new lease of life to a concept that had all but vanished. However, I do think that the choice of the personnel in this case, was wrong. Ashwin will never be a power player. He does not have the strength like a Symcox or Pant or Pandya. He is more of a touch player. In this case, he was asked to do something he was never accustomed. Needless to say, it failed but I hope that the intention remains. Rajasthan and other teams will do well go give a new lease of life for this concept. Ofcourse, it will fail but will succeed spectacularly if the right player is chosen.

Deepak Chahar ruled out

The mainstay of CSK bowling, Deepak Chahar has been ruled out of IPL 2022. This is a big blow to the team. He not only keeps it tight during the initial overs but also picks up a wicket or two. CSK who is already facing the heat with lack of quality bowlers will be handicapped further. Jadeja would have loved to have a different start to his captaincy career but it is unlikely to be. With no Hazlewood either, CSK is more or less ruled out from the playoffs. It is an ignominy that they underwent about a couple of years ago. The owners must be thinking about the mess that they made during the auction.

The CSK bidders must be taken to task for spending a whopping 14CR on someone who is unlikely to be available for the first half of the tournament. It was known even before the auction. The money must be paid to Deepak whether he played in all the games or none. Ofcourse, money is not the problem for the franchise otherwise, this particular pick does not make much sense.

Elsewhere on the international stage

Joe Root has finally relinquished his England captaincy. After months of being pushed from all the sides to resign and Root being adamant, some sense has finally been knocked into him. Root has often talked about him being passionate about taking the team forward and that his side played some brilliant cricket in the West Indies despite the series defeat. However, public opinion has changed following some relentless pressure for him to step down. Even the former cricketers have called publicly for Root to resign. This includes his immediate predecessor Alastair Cook.

“After returning from the Caribbean tour and having time to reflect, I have decided to step down as England’s men’s Test captain,” Root said. “It has been the most challenging decision I have had to make in my career but having discussed this with my family and those closest to me, I know the timing is right. I am immensely proud to have captained my country and will look back on the past five years with enormous pride. It has been an honour to have done the job and to have been a custodian of what is the pinnacle of English cricket.”

Now, the fun begins in English cricket. There is no obvious replacement within the team. Ben Stokes seems unwilling. Broad is out of the squad and so is Rory Burns. Will the English selectors be bold enough to do the unthinkable? Pick someone from out of the squad purely based on his captaincy credentials?

Other England related topics

Root & Stokes

Root & Langer’s positions

England need a new captain

About England in West Indies

ECB rings in the changes

Explore More

The top and middle-order let India down – 1

The top and middle-order let India down - 1

Now that the test is lost, I hope that the Indian team in general and Rahul Dravid in particular, understands the importance of a proper tour game ahead of an

The top and middle-order let India down – 3

Ravindra Jadeja Probably the most improved batsman in the world. I will write a separate blog about Jadeja. In this test, he showed why he is preferred to Ashwin though it was never between Jadeja and Ashwin. I have always said that Jadeja plays outside of India as a specialist batsman. Everyone knows that his bowling is non-threatening in English conditions. He may take advantage of a 5th day wearing pitch and that is about it. He paced his innings beautifully. The way he manipulated strike with the tail in the first innings was excellent. If only Pant had stayed with Jadeja, the lead could have been around the 450 mark. Shardul Thakur Shardul Thakur is not an express fast bowler. As such he can never terrorise any batsman with his pace. He is in the team in overseas conditions because he can contribute with the bat. If he fails with the bat and does not keep the economy rate down and provide breakthroughs, it is tough to justify his inclusion. After the enormous partnership between Pant and Jadeja, India needed one more partnership of 50-odd runs to establish authority over England. If only Shardul had stayed with Jadeja at the point, we may have well earned another 60-75 runs. A first innings score of close to 500 would have proved quite challenging but Shardul failed with the bat at the wrong time. Moreover, his bowling was not threatening and he missed an easy sitter of Stokes. Shardul was the star performer earlier in the series and as such this one bad game should not invite condemnation. However, Shardul must realise that he is in the team for his batting as much as he is for his bowling. In hindsight, would Ashwin had been a better choice than Shardul? Maybe may not be. The only reason that I am not able to emphatically say yes is the fact that there is no proof to the contrary. As Manjrekar rightly said, he is yet to take a 5-fer in the countries that matter. With age not on his side, it is anybody’s guess whether he will be able to correct that aberration. Mohammed Shami Shami is a brilliant bowler. We know that. Shami bowls some magic balls. We know that too. Shami makes the batsmen play more often. We know that one as well. Shami is unlucky. That is the problem. He is good and he does bowl lot of excellent deliveries but if they do not fetch frequent wickets, then there is a problem that needs to be identified. A couple of wickets in the second innings just when things started to look dicey for India, would have put the game firmly in India’s grasp. His record in England is a major concern. Just 38 wickets in 13 tests, under 3 per test is not the expected return from the premier fast bowler. It is unfortunate that despite his obvious talent, he has often failed to deliver against the major teams. This is the 3rd consecutive test that India failed to defend and Shami has a lot to contribute towards that dismal record. One good thing about Shami is that he showed maturity while batting in the first innings. He gave adequate support to Jadeja which is good to see. He played the short-balls much better than Shreyas. He will have to work with experts and see where is he going wrong? Does he have to pitch the ball much closer or short? Is the length the problem? Jasprit Bumrah The captain played a blinder and absolutely annihilated Broad. Sadly, it was with the bat. With the ball however, Bumrah once again failed at the crunch. He is quickly becoming the Kohli of bowling. For someone this talented, his match winning feats are less. He is the most protected Indian bowler. He has played all but just 2 of the games outside India. Bumrah is often given a break from tests in India. It makes sense because his action is so irregular that over-bowling may result in an injury but being the bowler the opposition plays cautiously and being the premier Indian bowler, to have failed to defend scores in the last innings on three successive occasions, it really casts a big question mark on his effectiveness. Whether all the pampering, is it really worth? The Edgbaston game was the 5th time in the last 10-12 tests that Bumrah did not raise to the occasion. It includes the WTC finals in conditions that is any fast bowler’s dream. Ofcourse, he picked up 5 wickets in the test but was still unable to break the Root-Bairstow partnership. I have written that he is becoming the Kohli of bowling. Kohli is similar in the sense that when faced with a target to chase, this is about Test cricket only, he is unable to win the game with his bat. He had a couple of opportunities in South Africa in 2017 and a couple more in England in 2017. Bumrah had this one apart from the two tests in South Africa, the WTC finals and the 2nd test in New Zealand. The last one was a long shot because the target was meagre. One thing to note is that he is not the rabbit with the bat anymore. He has certainly improved on that front but it is his bowling that is required. Mohammed Siraj Siraj usually is quite expensive. Even when he is among the wickets, he is expensive but even for him, this test would have been an awakening. He was literally taken apart by both Bairstow and Root. Towards the final stages, the way Bairstow toyed with him in the last over, any bowler would have been ashamed. These are early days and he has shown sufficient skill to become the mainstay but he must also realise that being the 3rd choice bowler, his chances will be limited when India play at home. Conclusion to the top and middle-order let India down This was a golden opportunity for India to win a series in England. Ofcourse, not when they were 98/5 but once a lead of 134 runs was secured, India must have accelerated quickly and must have built an impenetrable position. The negativity of Pujara, Vihari and to an extent Kohli and Jadeja, the recklessness of Pant, the inability of Gill to make a rare opportunity count and the impotence of the bowlers in the final innings meant that India were lucky that they had an upper hand for more than 60% of the game. Remember, we played with one player less because Shreyas is literally a free wicket. By the next time, India go over to England, some of these players would have retired and whether we will get another chance in the foreseeable future, is doubtful.

Before reading the top and middle-order let India down – 3, please read part 1 & 2 Ravindra Jadeja Probably the most improved batsman in the world. I will write

Kohli’s concern about bubble and Ganguly’s confidence

Kohli’s concern about bubble and Ganguly’s confidence

In the middle of the pandemic, with most of the sporting action behind closed doors, it has become pretty important to look after the mental aspect of the players, officials