It was bit of a confusing year for England. As is their wont, they were involved in the most number of Tests during the year. 17 of them with wins and defeats almost shared. Some of those losses were thumping enough to consider changes to the personnel, whereas there were some memorable wins too. The high of 2022-2023, when England reeled off wins after wins, on the back of Bazball, 2024 wasn’t that great a year for England. Nevertheless, it was a year that could neither be defined as excellent nor be defined as threadbare. There were successes and there were failures in equal measure. The white-ball team, a format that England redefined not long ago, suffered a lot during the year with several reversals. How was 2024 for England?

The year started off with great expectations on England. Afterall, about a year ago, they thumped Pakistan in Pakistan 3-0. It was an unprecedented result from an England side that have traditionally struggled against Pakistan. More than the win, the manner of the victories were significant. In every Test, England notched up mountain full of runs and at a very quick rate. Pakistan were neither able to stop the flow or runs nor were they able to pick up wickets regularly. The comprehensive manner of those wins, increased the confidence of the England cricketers but they were still wary of touring India. The innumerable number of reverses in India from 1990s, has sort of dent their confidence seriously that an Indian tour is considered among the toughest alongwith a tour of Australia.

Low of the season

True to what they feared, they were annihilated in 4 Tests. In the final innings, none of the players even wanted to be in India and they would rather go back to England. Such was the manner of their surrender in the final innings. Whatever that could go wrong, went wrong. The lack of effective spinners was dearly felt. England knew that spin will play a major part in the series. Yet, they chose to bring along cricketers who hardly have played any decent amount of cricket. Shoaib Bashir who may have some potential was among those who were expected to contain the Indian batsmen. His first class experience is not that different from his international experience. On what basis did Stokes picked him is beyond anyone’s wildest dream, afterall, his first class average is close to 50.

He is 21 and has time and age on his side. He can learn and he can improve but that must be at the County level and not at the international level.

Yes, England somehow managed to win the first Test on the back of a freakish Pope hundred. India were clueless in that game against a sweeping and reverse-sweeping Pope. It reminded all of us who bore witness to the sad day in the 1987 World Cup semi-final where Gooch swept the Indian spinners out of the tournament.

Nonetheless, that innings proved to be a flash in the pan. India adjusted themselves and ran over England in the remaining with the sole exception of the 3rd Test where an excellent innings from the debutant, Dhruv Jurel, stood between England and a win.

England’s inability to comprehend slow and turning pitches

Careers completed

McCullum did the right thing to talk to Anderson and make him announce his retirement. It was wrong on the part of Anderson to continue playing when everyone knows that he is not the same bowler. He might still pick up wickets on those England pitches if the overhead conditions complement his bowling but later this year in Australia, he would have been found wanting in all aspects regarding bowling. England would have been forced to drop Anderson in Australia. He avoided that ignominy.

The success of Bethell and Smith denotes that the days of Bairstow and possibly Foakes is also finished. It is unfortunate that Foakes has been judged on his ability to score runs rather than his brilliant keeping but that is how the modern day game is. Pure wicket-keepers are a thing of the past.

High of the season

Some may point to the win against India against all-odds but I think the series win in New Zealand was the high of the season. Sure England were expected to win but they absolutely streamrolled New Zealand into submission. England walked in like a Gladiator and walked out of it a clear winner. The last Test defeat was just an aberration.

Best performer of the season

Undoubtedly, it is Joe Root. He has been in such a freakish form over the last 4 years that he break records easily. He is certainly inline to break Tendulkar’s all-time record of the highest runs. About 3000 runs to go. Similar couple of years, he will get there rather sooner than later. Root has definitely let his fellow the so called Fab-4 by the wayside. In 4 years, he has scored 19 hundreds, the most by any batsman. This is simply unheard of. However, his lack of runs in some decisive games, against Pakistan and New Zealand will rankle him.

Ben Duckett is another who though not in the same sphere of Root, had a fabulous year. He became the first England opener since Alastair Cook in 2016, to score more than 1000 runs in a calendar year. In the absence of Bairstow, Duckett has taken the torch of Bazball further.

Poor performer of the season

Zak Crawley. He has been persisted with for far too long. Just like Shubman Gill, he has mostly flattered to deceive. Crawley has not reached 30 in the last 10 innings. That is an alarming statistic. He has the support of McCullum but how long will that continue? Crawley needs to gather himself and begin to score runs. India will be a good opportunity if he could survive Bumrah.

Wrapping up 2024 for England

2024 is done. 2025 has got a lot instore for England. Two vital series with the one in Australia being much more important for every English. With the turmoil facing India, England must prevail over India quite easily.

Australia & South Africa

Explore More

Kevin Pietersen was an enigmatic personality 2

Kevin Pietersen was an enigmatic personality 2

Before you read Kevin Pietersen was an enigmatic personality 2, please read part one here. When England returned to India Indians will always owe a debt of gratitude to KP.

England managed to keep Ashes alive

The whole of England would have screamed The Ashes is alive, The Ashes is alive, The Ashes is alive. Well, it is indeed alive. England fought back really well and ensured that they live to fight another day. The action at Headingley, the scene of Ben Stokes’s previous exploits, was riveting. The tension was palpable on the face of everyone watching the game. There were multiple heroes for both England and Australia. England will be the more happier of the 2 teams who were fighting for The Ashes. The victory was fashioned not by Stokes but by a bloke who is just in his first year in international cricket and a fast bowler, who should have been in the starting eleven right from Edgbaston. How did England managed to keep Ashes alive? The inclusion of Mark Wood He has got pace. He runs in hard and is not shy of releasing the ball at uncomfortable speeds. That, he wasn’t part of the England team from Edgbaston is for me, an unpardonable oversight unless he was injured. Wood’s pace and movement after pitching clearly unsettled every Australian player. I have been advocating for Wood to be included in every game until the series is decided. Ofcourse, it makes sense to protect such a precious asset but why wouldn’t you want to make use of his services when the series is alive? Does anyone think that without Wood, England would still have won and that too after the infamous Bairstow incident at Lords? I doubt it. Wood was clearly the difference between the 2 sides. Cummins who looked quite comfortable and assured of himself with the bat at Edgbaston and Lords, suddenly turned into a nervous wreck. Not just Cummins, the entire Australian tail was weary of facing upto Wood. They were afraid of getting hit by one of his thunderbolts. For once, Ollie Robinson’s words came true. Johnny Bairstow continues to flounder If only Bairstow had held onto the chances, England by now would have been leading 2-1 and not the otherway around. His keeping is not at all international standard. He misses every regulation nick and yet, he is persisted with for his batting. I am not advocating for Bairstow to be dropped but he must be relieved of his wicket-keeping duties. All the 3 games were won the Australia and England by small margins. As such, England cannot afford anymore largesse. It is another matter if England is short of good keepers but in Foakes, they have a worldclass keeper. Ollie Robinson will definitely not play at Old Trafford. It gives a good chance to bring Foakes back to keep wickets. Bairstow will probably be relieved to concentrate on batting alone. It may even unleash the beast within Bairstow. Let us remember that all those match-winning innings that Bairstow played last year, he wasn’t keeping wickets then. His replacement, Harry Brook, has gone on from strength to strength and cannot be dropped. Stokes has a tricky decision to make. Does he risk Ashes by persisting with Bairstow as the keeper or does he solidify the team with the inclusion of a brilliant wicket-keeper? It will shorten the bowling but Broad, Woakes, Wood, Moeen and if needed Stokes and Root will be able to bowl the necessary overs. If Bairstow continues to keep, probably one more Australian might tell him that “you have just dropped the Ashes” Boycott wants him dropped “England took a calculated gamble and it hasn’t worked,” wrote Boycott. “In three Tests he has dropped catches, missed a stumping and can’t score any runs. It is very sad and outwardly he may show he is upbeat and full of exuberance, but when you fail on the big stage in the full glare of publicity there is nowhere to hide and deep down it affects your confidence. Someone needs to be brave for him and take him out of the limelight. Well, I will not go that far. However, I certainly want him replaced as the keeper. Bairstow can continue as a batsman. Harry Brook showed his quality He has the potential to become one of the best batsmen of his era. He displayed remarkable composure under extreme pressure. Brook curbed his natural instinct to bat aggressively and decisively. The situation called for restraint and accumulation. In the company of Woakes, Brook showed what he is made of. England have really found a worthy successor to Root. Australia need not be disheartened The positives for Australia far outweigh the negatives. The excellent comeback of Mitchell Marsh, who may very well have played a match-winning innings if not for lack of support from the other end. Australia will now be very much unsure as to whom to pick. Whether they will have to go back to Green or do they continue with Marsh? Green has been seen as the future of Australian cricket and in the limited exposure, has not done anything wrong to be dropped. He is an excellent fielder at gully. It will make sense to continue with Green. Australia’s real problem is at the top. David Warner. 17 times he has fallen to Broad. Broad is not going anywhere. He will play the final couple of Tests. As such, he will relish the prospect of bowling to Warner. The only saving grace for Warner is that Australia does not have a reserve opener. Head opened in India but he has been so successful at number 5 that it does not really make any sense to move him up the order. Labuschagne himself is not among the runs and he is unlikely to. It leaves Mitchell Marsh to open the innings. I do not know whether he has opened even in Shield cricket but to do that in an international game needs a lot of courage. This could also be Marsh’s only opportunity to force himself into the side. If asked, I probably suspect that he will agree. Wrapping up England managed to keep Ashes alive It is not all doom and gloom for Australia. The momentum hasn’t shifted. This loss was always on the cards given the pressure on England. It took the brilliant bowling of Wood to unsettle them. They will be better off for this exposure

The whole of England would have screamed The Ashes is alive, The Ashes is alive, The Ashes is alive. Well, it is indeed alive. England fought back really well and

Should and can ODI cricket survive?

Should and can ODI cricket survive?

With Tests being the pinnacle of the game and T20 being the latest to capture the imagination of the spectators, where does that leave ODI cricket? There are growing chorus